President Barack Obama's big speech in Moscow was well-received, but Obamamania clearly has not reached Russia.
Flying to Italy Wednesday morning for the troubled G-8 summit, President Barack Obama departed Moscow after a very intriguing summit with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin.
This was the so-called "Reset Summit" to bring American/Russian relations out of the neo-Cold War depths they'd sunk to last year. It certainly succeeded at that, and at some other things as well, especially with regard to sharp reductions in nuclear weapons, aid for the US effort in Afghanistan, and a pullback on NATO expansion, a longtime thorn in the side of Russia. But other sticking points remained, on a US anti-missile shield and on Iran.
All amidst some notable intrigue, some of it generated from the Obama side.
Obama seems to have hit it off with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev.
Obama, by most accounts, has hit it off with Medvedev. Why not? They're about the same age, they're both lawyers, they both smile a lot, neither was in the military or intelligence. Quite unlike Putin, who has disparaged Obama for his inexperience, with Obama disparaging Putin for having "a Cold War mentality."
Obama spent most of his time with Medvedev. Joined by First Lady Michelle Obama, the American president had dinner Monday night with Medvedev and his wife, Svetlana Medvedeva.
But on Tuesday night, Obama was not available for Putin. Following a reception at the Kremlin, hosted by Medvedev, the Obamas repaired on their own to a glamorous nightclub with a view of the spectacular Moscow skyline. Night owl Putin was nowhere to be seen around Obama on either night. (The Obamas red-eyed it to Moscow on Sunday on Air Force One.)
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin made a point of explaining Russia and its objectives to Obama during a lengthy working breakfast at Putin's sumptuous dacha outside Moscow.
Instead, Obama had a breakfast slot for Putin on Tuesday. Putin had Obama come to his sumptuous dacha in a forest outside Moscow. They discussed ballistic missile defense, and Russian dislike of America establishing bases in Poland and the Czech Republic, NATO expansion, and the question of containing Iran, Russia's decades-long friend of a sort (and centuries-long rival).
The two hour-plus meeting went long -- in part because much of it was taken up by a Putin monologue -- and Obama ended up late for his major address of the week at the New Economic School back in Moscow.
Having lectured Obama and made him late for the first time ever for one of his major addresses, Putin went over to visit a famous motorcycle club. Which is pointedly headed to a big motorcycle rally in Ukraine, a country which Putin is intent on keeping out of NATO.
After making Obama late for his big speech, Putin visited the Black Wolf motorcycle club.
Obama, as you can see in the footage, was well-received in his address, which the White House describes as the third major speech about America in a new global framework, following earlier addresses in Prague and Cairo.
But he was not exactly rapturously received, especially in contrast to other Obama speeches. The truth is that he was barely interrupted by applause between the beginning of his speech and its end, despite there being no shortage of applause lines in the speech.
Unlike most of the rest of Europe, Russia is hardly in the grips of Obamamania. He's certainly more popular than George W. Bush or John McCain, but that's damning with faint praise. Nor is he unpopular.
The Russian media didn't react with excitement to Obama's election. It was more in the vein of a positive neutrality. And while Medvedev has on occasion waxed enthusiastic about Obama, that more neutral media tone about Obama has continued, perhaps following the cue of Putin.
While Obama and his team seem intent on promoting the relationship with Medvedev, it's worth remembering why Medvedev is the president of Russia. That's because Putin decided against changing the Russian constitution to enable himself to continue in the presidency. Which he was certainly popular enough to do.
While there doesn't seem to be a cult of Medvedev in Russia, there is certainly a cult of Putin. For all his seeming humorlessness, Putin is a very effective politician, an iron fist in a velvet glove. Ruthless enough to raze the city of Grozny after Boris Yeltsin made him prime minister with the charge of winning the war in Chechnya, urbane in his Italian suits and movie star-style collection of watches.
As president, Putin did a virtual town hall meeting every year, an hours-long telecast of people from around the country asking him questions on live television. I watched two of these performances, staged though they may have been, and Putin was every bit as good as any American politician would be.
While Medvedev has shown some signs of independence, he doesn't have Putin's history or personality cult going for him. And he's depended on Putin for his rise. After all, he was Putin's chief of staff, and then a deputy prime minister picked by Putin. And Medvedev (chairman of Gazprom, one of the world's biggest energy companies), was picked for the presidency by Putin, running for the office as the candidate of the ruling United Russia party, which is chaired by, you guessed it, Vladimir Putin.
Medvedev seems to be the good cop to Putin's bad cop. He's one of the few in the ruling circle who does not have an intelligence or military background. Putin, the Cold War KGB colonel and head of the FSB security service before becoming Yeltsin's prime minister, seems to have the bigger and longer-standing power base.
America and Russia agreed to big cuts in their nuclear arsenals amidst a thaw in relations.
So who came away with what?
** Both America and Russia scored with the agreement to cut nuclear arsenals by roughly a third and to encourage others not to develop nuclear weapons. The US looks more credible in its drive against nuclear proliferation by cutting its own nuclear arsenal. And Russia saves itself the expense and trouble of having to service aging weapons. Obama and Medvedev agreed to continue to work together to contain North Korea, Russia's historic ally.
** America scored with the announcement that Russia will allow US supplies, military equipment, and troops to be transported through Russia to the war in Afghanistan. The deal will allow 4500 flights a year through Russian airspace. Aside from a couple of test trips early in the year, then suspended for longer term talks, supplies for US forces have never transited through Russia before. And none of those trips involved American troops or weapons.
This is important as supply lines through Pakistan have come under serious attack in the past, and might again should the current Pakistani Army offensive against the Taliban fall short.
Both America and Russia have a deep interest in containing Islamic jihadism.
** And Russia scored with America agreeing to do more to suppress the Afghan drug trade. Afghanistan is a prime source for Russia's burgeoning drug problems.
** America scored again with Kyrgyzstan agreeing to continue allowing an important US base. In an amazing coincidence, Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiyev on Monday signed an agreement allowing the US to continue using its existing base at Manas airport outside the capital city of Bishkek. (Which was named Frunze when mountainous Kyrgyzstan was a Soviet socialist republic, after one of the key founders of the Red Army.)
Manas air base is the central hub of aerial refueling for US and NATO aircraft operating over Afghanistan. It is also a hub for C-17 flights into Afghanistan.
For months, Kyrgyz leaders, apparently prompted by Putin, had said that the US would be evicted. There were several incidents causing friction in Kyrgyzstan's often tumultuous politics, but the main reason seemed to a Russian desire to get rid of the last US base left in Central Asia after 9/11, when Russia helped the US gain several bases there.
Russia agreed to be quite helpful to the US in Afghanistan.
But now things are more copacetic between Russia and America, both countries are working together against Islamic jihadists, and the base remains. For a mere $60 million a year paid to Kyrgyzstan, triple the old rate.
** And Russia scored with Obama shifting US policy on NATO expansion. Following that long meeting with Putin, Obama altered US policy on NATO expansion in his Moscow address. The change comes around the 27-minute mark of the 31 minute address playable below.
After defending the territorial sovereignty of Georgia and Ukraine, an implicit criticism of Russia, Obama then shifts gears and says that new members of NATO must meet two new criteria: One, there must be popular support within the country for its accession to the NATO military alliance. Two, the country must have demonstrated military capability such that it is able to operate with existing NATO forces. Georgia and Ukraine almost certainly fail the test on both scores.
Putin has been very adamant for years against the policy of expanding NATO not only into Russia's traditional sphere of influence, but to its borders.
Russia was enraged by the Bush/Cheney Administration's deal with Poland for an anti-missile shield.
** What's left undone? The linked questions of the proposed US anti-missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic and the troublesome Islamic Republic of Iran. Obama essentially said that if Iran's nuclear weapons program is ended there is no real need for the anti-missile shield, which Russians have consistently said they believe is actually aimed at them.
Not that their missiles could not easily overwhelm any current US anti-missile system. What Russia apparently really dislikes is the idea of US bases in Poland and the Czech Republic, again constituting an encroachment into Russia's so-called "near abroad."
As for Iran, Russia can make things very difficult, if not impossible, for any air strikes by Israel or the US, by supplying Iran with state-of-the-art air defense systems, which it has not done.
Obama didn't give on the anti-missile bases and Russia didn't agree to do more to contain Iran.
On balance, a successful summit for Obama. But there's still much that can go south in the burgeoning new relationship between America and Russia.
You can check things during the day on my site, New West Notes ... www.newwestnotes.com.
Putin treats EVERYONE like an adversary and exploits any and all perceived weakness. This is the same guy who invaded Georgia, stoked riots in Estonia, cut off oil and gas in winter that killed thousands. Hey constantly threatens his neighbors, he has made political competitors "disappear."
Let's also not forget that Russia was brought out of the cold of the 1990's because foreign oil companies and investors made it possible for Russia to export massive quantities of oil, gas, and other natural resources. Putin has done nothing for Russia but gear it to unadulterated belligerence.
Doesn't make Putin a nice guy, but your dislike of him and Russia is obvious.
>>>> Let's also not forget that Russia was brought out of the cold of the 1990's because foreign oil companies and investors made it possible for Russia to export massive quantities of oil, gas, and other natural resources. Putin has done nothing for Russia but gear it to unadulterated belligerence.
Are you for real? Georgia attacked Russian positions in S.O., where do you get your facts from? The White House?
And what did the U.S. led NATO alliance do in Serbia? What did the U.S. do in Iraq?
And neither he, nor the Kremlin in general, are fooled by Obama's charm offensives. They know full well that US Foreign Policies in the Mid-East, South Asia, South America and Eastern Europe are (definitively anti-Russian) Brzezinski-outlined ones. Moscow, like Beijing and other BRIC/SCO nations, have practically memorized "The Grand Chessboard", word for word...
Putin helping "reorient the world into a multi-polar alternative to pure Anglo-American hegemony"? No, no, no! It was an idiot Bush who squandered away all good faith credit, moral authority, and actual military superiority that US had. And then of course, a reality kicked in, represented by growing China and an economic crisis.
Putin did nothing but sit on his oil and gas money, steal money from oligarchs, kill some Chechens, and bully his neighbors.
If anything, his rule was extremely ineffective in that he failed to transform all these record-oil-price revenues into any fundamental structural improvements in Russia.
Also, Putin wasn't as demonized as such a 'totalitarian KGB leutenant bully' when oligarch Boris Berezovsky SUPPORTED his candidacy during the twilight days of Yeltsin's rule (I wonder who's been kicking himself in London for the past decade for not doing 'enough due diligence'...).
And the record on Putin's utilization of high gas prices for a) power consolidation, b) energy monopolization (certainly vis-a-vis European gas supplies), and c) building of Russian state coffers for exactly this type of global economic 'correction', is clear.
There are tangible reasons why Henry Kissinger keeps in careful, respectful contact with Putin.
John D. Rockefeller himself is most likely spinning in his grave with envy...
He took an extremely demoralized country which was utterly unprepared for the post-Soviet era, in which it became a highly dysfunctional embarrassment, restored its pride and potency, and made it a great power again.
>And neither he, nor the Kremlin in general, are fooled by Obama's charm offensives. They know full well that US Foreign Policies in the Mid-East, South Asia, South America and Eastern Europe are (definitively anti-Russian) Brzezinski-outlined ones. Moscow, like Beijing and other BRIC/SCO nations, have practically memorized "The Grand Chessboard", word for word...
Time will tell of the bonhomie of this latest Obama/Medvedev meeting will last, especially as Nabucco goes up against the North/Southstream pipelines for access to Europe...
There's no "complaint." There is a set of observations.
And it's not even clear that Obama was well-received by Putin ...
>
photo
So the complaint is he was well-received but not "rapturously" received by Putin? W--T---F
If true, that may explain the somewhat indifferent behavior of the Russian people to the Obama visit. I hope somehow if it is true, that with time, Russians will realize they need to grow up. (Americans need to do the same about their view of the world but Russians gotta let go of their own jimcrow worldview. )
Or any American pol.
You probably dislike Obama, too, I'm guessing...
Anywho, it was obviously timed to President Obama's trip to Russia. All had opinion on Russia vs. NATO, the premise of the show, but I found Mr. Cohen's POV most riveting. Cohen said that if just the expansion of NATO to Georgia and the Ukraine were to stop, we could have anything we wanted. (not a direct quote, and I'm a foreign policy uper-novice). Here is the link if interewsted: http://www.charlierose.com/view/clip/10456.
It was an excellent show for someone like me. I see VP Joe Biden is returning to Georgia and Ukraine this month, almost a year after his last visit during the invasion.
uper = uber
interewsted = interested (I tot I taw a pooty tat)
I'm not a complete dolt, lol.
Chrystia Freeland is the smarter one, but being a part of the MSM is doing a fine job of promoting "official party line".
Clair Shipman was in this program uncharacteristically well informed.
Right next door and ballistic missiles are vulnerable after lift-off because the target is big and easy and they are rather slow as they fight to gain altitude and speed!
Need anymore scientific assistance?
Timeline: Just a few days after Georgia attacked Russian positions in S.O. the U.S. government was in Poland to get them on board with the ABM deal like this was a staged event to convince the weak-minded Poland into signing with the U.S. before Bush left office and blaming the Russians as the aggessors!
ABM base in Poland is for Russian nukes, not Iranian ones!
Obama got 4500 flights a year through Russian airspace. That is big.
Don't you agree?
They all work for the U.S. government!
You point the finger at foreign institutions yet ignore the heavy hand of our federal government over our lives!
You have a lot to learn bud!
Stop making it look like Russia is some backwards and old school nation! They are not.
Russia is 10-15 years ahead of the U.S. in missile technology!
You may think the Tomahawk is awesome but Russia has the Sizzler and Sunburn the most feared missiles in the world. Like Mach 2 just above sea level and it zig zag's before hitting its target. The U.S. has no counter measures against it, the Aegis system is useless against it making all carriers vulnurable to attack. The only hope is to fire the Phalnx system in rapid movements in the hopes of hitting one as it comes in.
You think the Patriot system is awesome? Try the S-300PMU2 and the S-400, far superior to what the U.S. has to offer!
And soon your tax dollars will be buying Soyuz rockets to launch Astronauts to the space station when the shuttle's are retired! That's right, the Russians have the most reliable rockets known to mankind and without them the space station would be dead if Russian boosters were not supplying the space station routinly!