Easily the most dramatic sequence in a rather strong press conference performance today by President Barack Obama was his vehement defense of UN Ambassador Susan Rice against attacks by Republican Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham.
Those two worthies said that they would go all out to prevent Rice's confirmation by the Senate should Obama appoint her to replace Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. This due to Rice's comments on a Sunday chat show about the Benghazi disaster several days after. Rice said then that the attack grew out of a protest against the notorious hate-Islam video Innocence of Muslims.
Obama was outraged by the McCain/Graham attacks on Rice.
"Let me say specifically about Susan Rice: She has done exemplary work. She has represented the U.S. and our interests in the U.N. with skill and professionalism and toughness and grace," said Mr. Obama. "If Senator McCain and Senator Graham and others want to go after somebody, they should go after me. And I'm happy to have that discussion with them. But for them to go after the U.N. ambassador? Who had nothing to do with Benghazi? And was simply making a presentation based on intelligence that she had received? To besmirch her reputation is outrageous."
Clearly Rice was wrong, and just as clearly the attack was simply that, an attack. Nobody brings machine guns and rocket launchers to a protest demonstration. And of course, it turns out that not only was the protest not simply a cover for the attack, it turns out that there was no protest at all.
Yet Rice had intelligence reports indicating otherwise. And there were multiple reports at the time, especially early on, indicating that it was all a protest gone very sour.
I think Rice has been a creditable UN ambassador. I haven't been especially impressed by the Stanford grad -- who is also a Rhodes Scholar with a doctorate from Oxford -- but she's advocated effectively for the U.S. position in tumultuous circumstances at the UN.
Savvy and common sense should have told her to disregard the intel suggesting that Benghazi was a protest gone wrong. For one thing, though later the Islamic world was rent by violent (and short-lived and smaller than advertised) protests over the hate-Islam video, on the anniversary of 9/11 there were significant protests in only two places: Cairo and Benghazi. The former made perfect sense, as the video got heavy play in the Egyptian media. But Benghazi? That never made any sense.
And, once again, who brings machine guns and rocket launchers to a protest?
So Rice fails a test of politico/military judgment.
Which does not mean that she deserves to be demonized. I can think of quite a few times that, say, John McCain has gotten things very wrong.
So should Rice be secretary of state? It certainly wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. And she might make a good one, especially since making mistakes is a good way to learn things.
But I would much rather see Senator John Kerry as the next secretary of state.
He's highly qualified and very experienced as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, with varied service on such bodies over the past few decades. He's a Vietnam War hero. And, oh yes, there is something else.
Obama owes Kerry. Big time.
In fact, without John Kerry, there is no Barack Obama. Or at least the Obama we know now.
It was Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry who selected Obama to give that fateful 2004 Democratic National Convention keynote address that shot him into the stratosphere of American politics.
I had never heard of Obama before that, and was incredulous when I learned that he was the keynoter. Who the hell is that, some state senator from Illinois?
That was before I heard him speak, of course.
But the party, the nation, and the world would never have heard Obama in such a perfect, high-profile venue in which to introduce himself had John Kerry not placed him there.
You can check things during the day on my site, New West Notes ... www.newwestnotes.com.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.