iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Yoani Sanchez

Yoani Sanchez

Posted: November 20, 2010 10:49 AM

The Mandarins Come By Boat

What's Your Reaction:

It is a mesh bag, a reddish woven net with five mandarins inside. They've been carried here -- from Europe -- by a reader who discovered where I live thanks to the tracks left in the blog. After I brought him a glass of water, he took the citrus fruits out of his backpack -- a little embarrassed -- as if he'd come to give me something too common on this island, even more common than the invasive marabou weed, or intolerance. It's inexplicable, then, why I grabbed the bag and buried my nose in every fruit. Within a few seconds I was shouting for my family to let them know about the orange globes I was already beginning to peel. Sinking my nails into their skin and smelling my fingers, I have a celebration of orange zest on each hand.

A trail of peels covers the table and even the dog is enthusiastic about the scent that is wafting through the whole house. The mandarins have arrived! The almost forgotten scent, the extravagant texture, have returned. My niece celebrates their appearance and I have to explain that once these fruits did not arrive by boat or plane. I avoid confusing her -- she's only eight -- with the history of the National Citrus Plan, and the large expanses on the Isle of Youth where oranges and grapefruits were harvested by students from other countries. Nor do I mention the triumphalist statistics thrown out from the dais, or the tropical island juices that started out with pulp extracted from our own crops and now are made with imported syrup. But I do tell her that when November and December rolled around, all the children in my elementary school smelled like oranges.

What days those were! When no one had to bring us, from a far off continent, what our own earth could produce.

Yoani's blog, Generation Y, can be read here in English translation. Translating Cuba is a new compilation blog with Yoani and other Cuban bloggers in English.

 
 
 

Follow Yoani Sanchez on Twitter: www.twitter.com/yoanisanchez

It is a mesh bag, a reddish woven net with five mandarins inside. They've been carried here -- from Europe -- by a reader who discovered where I live thanks to the tracks left in the blog. After I bro...
It is a mesh bag, a reddish woven net with five mandarins inside. They've been carried here -- from Europe -- by a reader who discovered where I live thanks to the tracks left in the blog. After I bro...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:27 PM on 11/22/2010
Cuba sugar production was 1.1 million MT in 2010. The estimate for 2011 is close to one million MT with a population of 11.4 millions. In 1894, one year before the War of Independence, the island produced over one million MT with a population of 1.7 millions. More than 117 years later the Castros regime will be producing even less.

In 1959 Cuba exported 5.0 million tons. In the years just preceding the 1959 Revolution, Cuba has been the larger exporter of sugar cane in the world. Who would have imagined a few years ago that the world's largest exporter of sugar would have to resort to external supplies to meet its needs?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dnlmsstch
too much for so few words
10:26 AM on 11/23/2010
Sugan cane is extrmely depleative to the soil, without fertilizers (banned by the embargo) or clearing more virgen land it gives you deminishing returns.
02:35 PM on 11/23/2010
Dear Castro defender, Cuba was the first producer of sugar in the world for centuries and we developed systems to enrich our soil centuries before fertilizers were invented. Castro destroyed the Cuban sugar industry because he is an extreme megalomaniac person and he believes he can work at any branch of a country’s economy with no need of assessors. In the era of the huge soviet subsides USSR bought most Cuban sugar production at prices 22 cents over the international prices, Castro thought the country not needed sugar factories not involved in the production of soviet sugar supply and destroyed. Castro put also aside the modernization of the sugar industry to reduce production costs. When USSR disappeared and sugar price was very low in the international market Cuba could not afford to produce sugar at competitive prices. So was how was destroyed the Cuban Sugar Industries (including sugar production sub products) ........This destruction was not wasted by the world. Florida, that in 1960 had just 3 sugar mills and produced only 150.000 tons of sugar used in its favor Castro's stupidity and built one of the biggest sugar industries in the world catching the markets left by Castro. Today Florida produces 21 million tons of sugar. Such production was never reached by Cuba. Brazil and Australia were other of the countries benefited by Castro’s stupidity. Both countries are today’s leaders in production of sugar industry's sub products like ethanol, cattle food, alcohol, fertilizers, etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
08:26 PM on 11/21/2010
Can Cuba again become a major citrus exporter, or at least increase production to fulfil their own needs?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ira7
05:53 AM on 11/22/2010
Sure.

It's called capitalism.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
04:39 PM on 11/21/2010
If the US ends the blockade, the Castro government probably won't last long. US policy towards Cuba gives the current government an excuse to maintain power as it does.

Besides, the island has some great culture.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
khanti
Cultivator
01:22 AM on 11/22/2010
These type of bullying tactics never work instead people become more resiliance. Look at North Korea and Iran and even Myanmar the leaders there aren't losing sleep over the sacntions instead the common people are the ones that are affected. The sanction on Cuba is just to win the votes of Cuban exiles in the US.
09:14 AM on 11/22/2010
Why did not the world use this “tactic” “you” propose against apartheid South Africa????
No tyranny has fallen by “bombing” it with millions of dollars. What you are proposing is simply to support castrofascism. What the world has to do is to join the USA and transform the couple of sanctions still actives in a real and working embargo in order to rid out this criminal tyranny out of Cuba.
Cuban people problems will not be affected by the lifting of the sanctions. Cubans had same hunger, repression and difficulties when regime received 5000 millions dollars yearly from USSR the first 30 years of tyranny. We now lift the sanctions and Cubans life conditions will no change but will get worst because tyranny will feel free to repress, kill and incarcerate. Tyranny will feel then that it has the world approval for do as it please against the Cubans.
By the way….. who wins the Cuban exiles votes are other Cuban exile, who maintain the sanctions are we the Cuban exiles through the exile Cuban politician we votes. We have 2 senators and 6 congressmen that works hard enough with both republican and democrats partners to keep the sanctions against castrofascism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dnlmsstch
too much for so few words
10:17 AM on 11/23/2010
Read about the reagan policy against south africa (especialy from the State department guy named Crocker) we did not use sanctions and full blockade in S Africa - we used "smart" sanctions. Targeted sanctions on specifict items (IE military supplies and luxury items agaisnt the elite) and encoraged trade in items that helped the population, and with funding for groups promoting peacefull democracy. This is the same policy being used agaisnt used agaisnt iran and N Korea (although its even more restrictive in N Korea once it became known they are the worlds largest conterfiters of us $ and the Nuke program). The only reason we have this level of restrictions agaisnt cuba is because the cuban american comunity decides who florida votes for - and they want punishing sanctions agaisnt castro. Cuba is no worse than China, S Korea and Tiwan (in the 80's) Soudi arabia, and a host of other nations. But because their expat dont control one of the biggest swing states in the country - they are not under an embargo.

PS the cuban exiles also worte in the law provision to allow them to help their families (traveling to the island and remitances permits) while other suffer in the name of defeating comunism. Once castro falls the i believe the cuban exile community will NOT be seen as heros nor the embargo will be seen as effective or mercifull.
03:03 PM on 11/23/2010
You are right…. and the embargo on castrofascism involves just 2 major items: Travel ban and credits.
The bans on other issues related in the embargo law are long before lifted, including medical supplies that arrive to Cuba almost exclusively from USA making USA the biggest supplier of medical devices and medicines to Cuba. As early as 1975 US gov. lifted bans to export automotives and other industrial production fabricated for American corporations in third countries. It was famous the ridiculous and close relationship created between castrofacism and the fascist regimen of Videla in Argentina after huge commercial exchanges of both countries that includes the production of Chevrolet factories in Argentina.
The success of the embargo on South Africa was not in the amount or quality or directions of the sanctions but in the world unanimity. As long as exists countries in the world that does not join the embargo castrofascism will have the idea that it has the right to kill, to imprison, to beat, to repress
The people of China, North Korea or Myanmar have not a strong and active voice in USA acting to avoid the unmoral relationship with such criminal regimes. We Cubans have it….. and we will not allow US gov. to get in unmoral relationships with the assassins of our people. You and others like you better use your time criticizing US gov for acting as a simply criminal accomplice when supporting regimes like China.
12:24 AM on 11/21/2010
We need to end the embargo with Cuba. Allow travelers to visit and intact, it will do mor good than harm to engage with the people of Cuba instead of isolating them.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
04:38 PM on 11/21/2010
exactly
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
08:26 PM on 11/21/2010
Seconded. The missile crisis ended a long time ago, but some of this relies on Cuba to also be more open with the rest of the world. Would they welcome open relations with the United States?
08:05 AM on 11/23/2010
look at the development of China once Nixon went to China.
05:53 PM on 11/20/2010
Cuba was one of the most prosperous countries in Latin America before 1959. Under the Castrofacism the island economy has been ruined beyond recognition, transforming it into a third world country. After 51 years of failure still there are people who defend this regime. Ubelievable!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TStringfellow
Wobbly, politically and literally
08:49 PM on 11/20/2010
First off, "one of the most prosperous countries in Latin America" is hardly a clearly defined statistic. Second of all, it's actually true of today, the Cuban people enjoy a relatively high standard of living for the region, much higher than in pro-U.S., right wing Capitalist states such as Colombia.

Look to Haiti for a glimpse of what Cuba would look like without the Revolution.
09:43 PM on 11/20/2010
Remind me, how many elections has Castro won?
07:14 PM on 11/22/2010
Capitalism built Cuba….. 99% of hospitals, schools, buildings, roads, tunnels, bridges housing, in few words Cuba was built before castro including the health and educational system that castro inherited but wants to present as his achievement. The only castrofascism has built is a huge and 51 years long propaganda campaign.
Reading the post “Havana, A City Seasoned By The Old, Increasingly Distant From The Modern” in this very page you will find that almost the whole Havana was built from 1902 to 1959. This statistic and this model of Havana shown in this post were presented in a museum by castrofascism ….. I mean, it is not “disinformation propaganda presented by freak right winger of Miami”
You all believing castrofascism has done something in Cuba or built there something that does not existed are just people fooled by castro’s propaganda.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
04:37 PM on 11/21/2010
It was prosperous for a few oligarchs who were executives for US corporations. Most of the population lived in abject poverty. 75% of the island was owned by non-Cubans, and the mafia controlled practically the entire economy. Never mind what a thug Batista was.

BTW, can you define fascism? I mean without parroting Glenn Beck?
09:30 AM on 11/22/2010
Because I don't like to write thing without proves to back my statements..... here I give a link to............ Juventud Rebelde cyber edition (Rebel Youth: Official organ of Cuban Communist Youth) where this indoctrination organ publishes part of the book of the Investigator and Writer Guillermo Jimenez "Cuba's Owners 1958"...... Jimenez, making an amazing investigative work give the relation of the names of Cuba's owners, the people that owned properties and business in pre castro Cuba in year 1958. Jimenez gives the complete list of names of this people classified by estimated fortune and properties relation....... This investigation shows that 99% of Cuba's owners were CUBANS!!!!! in 1958...... Cubans had pushed out almost totally all US companies and international owners was a little % shared by US, Spain and Latin Americans natives.

http://www.juventudrebelde.cu/columnas/lectura/2007-06-17/propietarios-ii-y-final/

http://cubalpairo.blogspot.com/2007/12/categoras-1-y-2-libro-post-anterior.html
09:44 AM on 11/22/2010
Never mind what a thug Batista was???!!!

What’s the difference between batista and castro???
Both were helped to the power by USA, both were backed by Cuban Communist Party , Both had among theirs ministers the 2 leaders of Cubans Communist Party, both started their political life as revolutionaries, both ended as dictators, both killed Cubans, repressed, jailed and abused Cubans, there is no differences between those criminals. Of course castro wins the competition for long, very long space……
Please, if you don’t have enough knowledge about Cuba’s history do not try to deny above related facts…. You can look very ridiculous when I start to produce proves.