More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Yolanda Reid Chassiakos

GET UPDATES FROM Yolanda Reid Chassiakos
 

Fighting Obesity With a Smoking Gun?

Posted: 04/12/10 11:37 AM ET

"We blew it. They lived for 60 years skinny, then dropped dead of a heart attack or lung cancer. No social security, no long-term care, no diabetic old geezers eating up Medicare. We made our money and never had to pay it back." The pinstripe suited character blows cigar smoke at the camera. "Why did we ever get them to stop smoking!"

I'm certain that dialogue is in a screenplay somewhere, most likely the virtual one of a hard-hearted Republican. Skyrocketing health care costs from our obesity epidemic were an unforeseen evolution of our efforts to improve public health, first, by enhancing agricultural production and food supplies, and second, by actively discouraging cigarette smoking.

No, of course the simplistic solution is not to close down grocery stores and promote our re-addiction to nicotine as we head out to farm our vegetables. But activists appropriately fighting our obesity epidemic must acknowledge societal factors beyond "garbage in, fat out" as contributing to obesity among our species. with its caloric-conserving "thrifty gene."

Factors that promoted slimness in our history (bluntly identified) included:

• "The Thrifty Gene" that conserved calories in times of famine, pestilence, and war. Limited resources meant that those who used those resources most efficiently had the greatest chance of survival.

• Necessary physical activity. (A world without cars, household appliances, and supermarkets meant constant movement and exertion, simply to eat. Endorphins were a rewarding bonus.)

• Leisure physical activity. (A world without televisions, computers, video games, 15 hour work days, and child kidnappers on every street, meant outdoor and indoor active play, especially for children.)

• Smoking. (Yes, our very first "organic" antidepressant, nicotine, got our society through the transition from active agricultural to sedentary service industries, from open fields to Excel spreadsheets. Of course, smoking is harmful and lethal -- heart attacks and lung cancer are only the beginning. Emphysema sufferers can linger for decades in agony. But, nicotine does increase neurotransmitter levels such as dopamine in the brain and reward its users with euphoria and relaxation, and is an MAO inhibitor.)

We all know many of the factors promoting obesity: Easily available, high-fat and calorie "fast food"; processed/refined carbohydrates and sugars; a desk-bound lifestyle; sodas; TV and other screen media; lack of funds to purchase 'healthy' foods; lack of time to prepare 'healthier' dishes; lack of adequate sleep, etc. And, of course, stress.

Would that we could all have a personal chef like Oprah, or a cheerleader-trainer like Kirstie, as well as the time to devote to daily workouts. Many victims of obesity live in economically and/or safety-challenged environments, without fresh produce or healthy foods easily affordable or available. Outdoor activities may be limited by risks to life and limb rare a few decades ago.

Blaming victims of obesity for their "lack of self-control" cruelly ignores the realities faced by most working class, and even middle class individuals and families, whose relative incomes and personal and financial resources have been shrinking over the past 30 years as obesity rates have been rising. Encouraging Americans to adopt a more active lifestyle and healthy eating without addressing the economic and psychological realities of our depression is doomed to failure.

Of course we should all be eating a balanced diet as guided by the revised food pyramid, engaging in moderate exercise on a daily basis, and reducing stress through meditation, yoga, and other behavioral interventions. But, sleeping a refreshing eight to nine hours, getting up and enjoying a healthy breakfast, working out one to two hours, stimulating our minds in a rewarding and inspiring six hour a day/five day a week job, sushi for lunch, salmon for dinner, a quiet walk by the ocean before bed, is not in the cards for most of us.

Working two or three jobs; marshaling children and grandchildren at the crack of dawn to buses and safely to schools; racing to the low-control, low-pay retail store, factory, or office; grabbing a quick meal in the drive-thru line or the vending machine; keeping up the "numbers" as your computer activity is monitored; squeezing out the last month's rent; buying cheap food for the kids with Uncle Jim's disability check; and collapsing in front of the TV for Leno's monologue aren't conducive to supporting healthy choices in food, drink, or self-care. Survival, in this case, is of the non-fittest.

So, clearly we must praise interventions by Washington to improve nutrition for children and adults, in schools, in the food service industry, and in the home. We must promote education regarding health and wellness, and the enhancement of activity. But, we must target societal changes, and not just individual efforts, to truly succeed in halting the obesity epidemic. Some hopeful suggestions come to mind that we can ask Santa to bring us this year:

• Return the economy to stable footing and provide rewarding opportunities to those seeking employment and career advancement. Promote a work/life balance for all Americans instead of a karoshi treadmill.

• Expand public transportation networks coupled with "foot energy" to replace cars and oil.

• Declare a "War on War". Peace -- not just overseas, but in our own backyards, so children and adults can once again play safely in theirs. Our intervention efforts domestically should enrich our families, not drug profiteers.

• Reduce stress for all Americans -- focus our internal resources on supporting ourselves and our communities. Return taxpayer dollars to their proper roles--the support of society in need, including public option housing, health care, food, and quality education.

• Provide free or affordable counseling; nutritional, exercise, and psychological; for all Americans who need assistance with their lives. Expand non-medication approaches rather than pharmaceuticals as a first option for psychological conditions where appropriate.

• Declare discrimination towards those suffering from obesity illegal, whether on airlines or job interviews. Help support improved quality of life for those struggling with the emotional and medical complications of obesity, and recognize that lifelong cures are difficult to find and maintain, even with the best intentions. Don't enhance psychological stress for those already challenged.

Making our lives healthier will improve our bodies' health. And that would be a WIN for us all.

 
 
 
"We blew it. They lived for 60 years skinny, then dropped dead of a heart attack or lung cancer. No social security, no long-term care, no diabetic old geezers eating up Medicare. We made our money...
"We blew it. They lived for 60 years skinny, then dropped dead of a heart attack or lung cancer. No social security, no long-term care, no diabetic old geezers eating up Medicare. We made our money...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
aurora59
Sarcasm: just one of the many services we offer
09:32 AM on 04/14/2010
Thank you, thank you, thank you!! You've touched on every aspect of the obesity problem in this country and without once vilifying or scapegoating a particular group in doing so. I thoroughly enjoyed reading your post and hope you will write further on the subject here on Huffpo!
03:58 PM on 04/12/2010
The one "factor" omitted from those listed as promoting obesity
may be the most important one. The efficacy of the individual as
a worthy individual and necessary to the well being of our entire
society.
We are not herds existing for the purpose of being the source of
statistical analysis. We are individuals.
My former dentist had a "preventable dentist plan" (she probably
still has it and probably still pushing it) that would work for all of
her patients.
One size fits all.
Well, no. One size doesn't fit all. We are like snowflakes. No two
of us are alike and all the statistics in the world or ever dreamed
of will not make us identical. I know that confounds statisticians
but they'll just have to learn to live with it.
01:49 PM on 04/12/2010
I assume Ms. Chassiakos will trade seats with me on the airplane if someone else is overflowing into the one that was assigned to me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JillJackson
04:22 PM on 04/12/2010
I'd like to think that airlines would make accommodations for those needing more room as they do for others with special needs. And treat the individuals with discretion and respect. It is the perception of "sloth", of lack of self-control, rather than an understanding of the multiple factors contributing to obesity, that leads to not arranging for a couple of rows of wider seats in coach. They used to have smoking sections--why not some wider seats throughout economy class on the plane? .
09:48 PM on 04/12/2010
They don't have smoking sections anymore though, do they? Considering that the costs incurred by an airline are by weight and by volume, it's only fair that they should charge people who occupy more space or are heavier proportionately more.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JillJackson
12:16 PM on 04/12/2010
Fat-ism is still the last acceptable prejudice. The blame game helps nobody, and creates more stress. I don't drink, and don't think about alcohol--my recovering alcoholic friends don't drink and think about alcohol every day. Each day is a struggle, and it's harder with food because you can't stop eating completely. And so many professional and social events are centered around food. People for whom "not eating" isn't a struggle, just don't understand. Kindness and compassion will go a long way...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Atchka
Fierce, Freethinking Fatties
01:20 PM on 04/12/2010
Jill,
I'm right along with you, except for the notion of fatism as the last acceptable prejudice. There are plenty of minority groups (transsexuals, for one) who still experience discrimination and irrational contempt.

The real difference is how all the efforts to "end obesity" are reinforcing that prejudice (for instance, the CDC's LEANworks! site gives employers a great justification for engaging in workplace discrimination against fatties) by helping them calculate how much money they're losing thanks to obesity.

http://atchka.blogspot.com/2009/11/fatty-roll.html

The focus and pressure is much greater on obese Americans than any other group right now, but we're not the last... as long as there are humans around, there will be a need for Folk Devils to unite us against a common enemy.

Peace,
Shannon
Atchka.com
FierceFatties.com
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Atchka
Fierce, Freethinking Fatties
11:47 AM on 04/12/2010
What's that? You're saying obesity isn't completely due to lack of self-control? Okay, prepare yourself for an onslaught of ignorant refutation because HuffPo commenters can't STAND nuance.

Peace,
Shannon
photo
Epiphany2b
Always waiting for the light to dawn
01:02 PM on 04/12/2010
You didn't just stereotype the whole posting community on Huffington Post, did you? That's not much different from stereotyping all obese people, all races and nationalities, is it? Surely there are a few here who can nuance with the best of 'em!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Atchka
Fierce, Freethinking Fatties
01:13 PM on 04/12/2010
Ephiphany2b,
Sorry to offend, but yeah... I'm stereotyping. Visit any thread on Gabby Sidibe and attempt to ingest the ignorance and contempt. And those who aren't explicitly hating on Gabby are engaged in a crusade to save her from herself by assuming she's a walking timebomb.

Hell, even look at this thread about plus sized model Tara Lynn...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/26/french-emelleem-features_n_514800.html

Nuance is few and far between.

But in fairness, HuffPo is just a microcosm of the current state of affairs. Most people aren't capable of accepting a nuanced view of obesity because we're in such a state of panic. I don't think that predicting a backlash toward a moderate viewpoint on obesity is all that outrageous.

Peace,
Shannon