EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    


Article written by Spencer Critchley and Zach Friend

We knew this was coming. The media have finally noticed the gap between Barack Obama's extraordinary achievements -- health care reform, financial reform and preventing a depression, to name a very few -- and his seeming inability to win credit for them. "Why can't Obama get a break?" is the meme of the day.

Of course, the issue is not so much that the president can't win credit, it's that others, including the media, can't give it to him. The loss of that distinction is in itself a sign of this disconnect.

As with any trend, there is no single cause for this one. Rather, multiple causes come together at the right time and reinforce each other.

Cause number one is simply the economy. Yes, we avoided total collapse. Yes, recovery looks to be well under way. But unemployment is still high, people are still scared and angry, and they blame the person in charge now, instead of those who actually caused the problem in the past.

The second cause is deeply ironic: Obama's very strength, it turns out, can be a weakness. After his fast rise against enormous odds, many people actually seem to believe that he is superhuman -- that he should be able instantly to unite the country, solve unemployment, end wars and terrorism and while he's at it, fix health care and end pandemics.

This ends up hurting him with both the right and the left. The right thinks he magically concealed his true socialist, terrorist-loving, dictatorial nature and that he is somehow able to "ram" legislation "down our throats." Meanwhile critics on the left see him as repeatedly falling short of what he could have done if only he had really tried -- he's already one of the most accomplished presidents in history, and yet they think he's dogging it. For both right and left, the inconvenient truth of democracy gets lost -- that you have to have the votes.

The third cause is discipline -- too much of it on the right, too little on the left. On the right, we have The Party of No. The GOP appear to be gambling everything on trying to make Obama fail, hoping voters will give him and his party most of the blame. We think this is a shameful disservice to the country. But Democrats could learn something from Republicans' ability to play on the same team.

Instead, too many Dems leave every huddle criticizing the play instead of forming up to make it work. Take financial reform - the most sweeping such reform since the 1930s. This is how the lead Democratic author, Senator Chris Dodd, described it to the media immediately afterward: "It's not a perfect bill, but we believe we've done the best we could under the circumstances..." Senator Russ Feingold took it a step further. He voted against the bill, as is of course his right. But he also saw fit to state that "It doesn't do the job, and I'm not going to be part of basically defrauding the American people into thinking it does." Who needs an opposing team when you play against your own with that kind of commitment?

We saw the same kind of thing with the passage of the greatest health care reform since Medicare, with the economic stimulus, energy reform and more. Of course we should be willing to disagree; openness to debate is part of what makes us Democrats. But being a Democrat is also supposed to mean working together for the common good. Democrats need to start running on pride in their party's accomplishments, contrasting themselves with the Party of No. As David Plouffe said so cogently, the bedwetting needs to stop.

Accomplishments, no matter how impressive, are not enough. It's the stories of those accomplishments that move hearts. The Republicans, drawing from a deep well of corporate advertising talent, are expert at telling emotionally powerful stories, often with scant concern for the truth. In response, Democrats present... facts. The facts prove that there aren't any death panels. But boy, the image of death panels sure sticks in your head, doesn't it? The facts prove that Obama deserves a whole lot more credit than he's getting. But the constant narrative to the contrary can make it feel like he doesn't. And since the media must have stories to hold their audiences, they are all too happy to repeat them. But if we kill the bedwetting, and show the contrasts, the story this November can have a much happier ending.


Boots Road Group founder Spencer Critchley is a communications consultant whose clients have included Democratic political candidates, National Public Radio, and the Emmy-winning documentary "Blink". He served on press teams for Barack Obama's presidential campaign in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Colorado.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 560
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
Passenger57
Keeping Calm And Carrying On...
08:11 AM on 08/03/2010
Wouldn't it be just a HOOT if Obama started reading all of this stuff and said to himself, "Geez, I must be the CRAPPIEST president EVER!" , and then decide not to run again?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProudLiberalDan
Standing up an fighting conservatives since 1987
03:53 PM on 08/03/2010
Cool. That would make my day.

Maybe we could then elect a President who doesn't sell his political capital for corporate campaign cash.

But I doubt it.
scipio2009
Alan Wolfe's "The Future of Liberalism"
07:41 PM on 08/04/2010
Just to clarify something:

Is there not a single President of the United States, in the history of this country, that you're even proud of having?

You hate Obama, you hate Clinton, you hate Carter, you hate Bush the Younger, you hate Bush Sr., you hate Reagan, and, to go even further, you also probably hate Nixon, Ford, LBJ, Eisenhower­, and Hoover.

If JFK, God rest his soul, hadn't been assasinate­d within two years of his first term in office, you probably would've hated him too. Hilarious.
QuietLightTraveler
Scientist, Teacher, Naturalist, Photographer
09:48 PM on 08/02/2010
Stop making excuses for Obama. There was no reason to come out and support offshore drilling.
There was no reason to defer to BP on the oil cleanup in the Gulf and sit by while BP used toxic chemicals that will make the damage worse. There was no reason to sue Arizona for trying to p[rotect itself when the Federal Government has been totally irresponsi­ble when it comes to addressing immigratio­n. There was no reason to sabotage the Public option. There was no reason to escalate the war in Afghanista­n. Obama has to look in the mirror to see why his numbers have gone down and no where else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
margoharris
I used to be Snow White but I drifted.
01:19 AM on 08/03/2010
He went to Harvard not Hogwarts.
02:19 PM on 08/03/2010
There was no reason to appoint Wellpoint VP Liz Fowler to be responsibl­e for enforcing the consumer protection­s in health care - he could have appointed a consumer advocate, not an industry lobbyist, but he did anyway.

I'd believe the "he tries but they get in his way" argument more with better appointmen­ts, but I won't be surprised if he leaves Warren hanging in the breeze the way he did with Johnson.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bascombe
send the kids off to die, suck their country dry
07:51 PM on 08/02/2010
it's intentiona­l
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VJ2008
06:10 PM on 08/02/2010
If only we had a press corps that was not owned by big money special interests.­..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
margoharris
I used to be Snow White but I drifted.
08:02 PM on 08/02/2010
From your fingers to God's ears.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:09 AM on 08/03/2010
Just means we have to work harder on these blogs to keep the nay sayers at bay - see my post below to Duppy.
05:50 PM on 08/02/2010
the reason he is not getting any credit is because the media has no credibilit­y and instead prefers to focus on stories that are headline grabbing scandals and ones that sensationa­lize to try to grab an audience. The day for main stream media is soon at hand and they will be abandoned by the American people for their lack of focus on the isssues. The main stream media these days is similar to the National Enquirer or the Star magazine.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:08 AM on 08/03/2010
Duppy, Excellent points. Makes our work all the more important - to force feed facts, issues and accomplish­ments down the nay sayers - get them talking solutions, don't let them just post negatives.

Its good to share thoughts on what Obamas has done wrong, but not without givine credit where credit is due at the same time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:24 PM on 08/02/2010
A clearly presented position - thank you - saving.

As for the news media - they are on a ratings feeding frenzy and bad news = ratings. Shame on them - not much better than the talking heads.

But this article oddly leaves out talking heads, who present themselves as news shows and pretent they are news people, when all along they are just entertaine­rs, wanna bes who can only get by with detroying everything that comes their way.

Just stop listening to them - try it for one month, then go back - you wil be agast.
Chauncey1186
Sink the Pink! Boycott SGK!
03:12 PM on 08/02/2010
Pyrrhic victories don't count.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Artemis34
Mommy says the rich men need our food stamps.
02:12 PM on 08/02/2010
Republican­s didn't care if they had 60 votes or not.

If not, they'd just ram it through reconcilia­tion where you only need 50 votes + the VP to break the tie.

And if you didn't like that they VP would tell you to go eff yourself!
02:19 PM on 08/02/2010
And they made good use of recess appointmen­ts. Letting Dawn Johnson hang out in the breeze for head of DOJ showed that Obama wasn't serious about restoring the rule of law to the Presidency­.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
08:02 PM on 08/02/2010
Yeah. It's too bad we didn't get a president with any backbone.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:12 AM on 08/03/2010
There you go again, just negative and making assumption­s, spreading smear.

What are our solutions?

Who exaclty do you want to replace Obama that will be "perfect" in everyway?
02:10 PM on 08/02/2010
More good news. Thanks Zach, I needed that.

Keep it coming!
02:10 PM on 08/02/2010
As seen in comments in this thread, Democrats don't WANT progressiv­e votes. They don't want progressiv­e GOTV efforts in the next election.

When Rahm Emanuel called progressiv­es something that cannot be posted in the comments of this thread, he showed the true White House colors.

I don't see how Democrats can call progressiv­es traitors when they support nothing that progressiv­es want. Expanding Afghanista­n. Gutting Health Care Reform (and appointing Wellpoint VP Liz Fowler to enforce those consumer protection­s). Gutting financial reform (and pushing for anyone but Elizabeth Warren to head that consumer agency). Expanding the spying on civilians and targeted killings of American citizens of George Bush. Creating a commission to cut Social Security benefits while those on the committee pay a smaller percentage in taxes than firefighte­rs or school teachers.

These aren't progressiv­e values and progressiv­es won't fight for them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:26 PM on 08/02/2010
Wrong. The article stands on its own. It paints you exaclty the way YOU are, not the way progressiv­es are.
06:41 PM on 08/02/2010
If there weren't any upset progressiv­es, there wouldn't be a gap. If I'm the only one that's upset, then the Democrats will win by a landslide and have even more seats in November.

If my complaints are shared by many progressiv­es, then maybe Democrats should act on them and win back their base instead of constantly drifting right to please voters that will never support them.

As Harry Truman said, given the choice between a real Republican and a fake one, Republican­s will choose the real one every time. There's no value in drifting right from a voter point of view. Democrats are now losing as much as they gain. From a corporate cash point of view, otoh...
photo
maserati2
Finally an honest politician! ELIZABETH WARREN!
09:59 PM on 08/02/2010
I stand with meko, along with any Progressiv­e that refuses to accept a party line of "compromis­e", when that means accepting and enforcing the demands of corporatio­ns and the "other" party, the one that actually lost the last election.

Notice: Corporatio­ns have bought their way into the command posts of both parties and make no secret of their intentions to condemn Main Street to the bottom of the food chain. This attack for supremacy is coming from within our own country, we are in the fight of our lives yet we are expected to quietly and obediently toe the line.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Artemis34
Mommy says the rich men need our food stamps.
11:46 PM on 08/02/2010
"Corporati­ons have bought their way into the command posts of both parties and make no secret of their intentions to condemn Main Street to the bottom of the food chain."

This was the point of union busting. Labor unions used to nominate and fund people's candidates­. Now they can't muster more than 1/10th of 1% of campaign financing.

Obama came close to replacing union funding with direct internet donations.

Because he came close to replacing union (people's) funding, corporatio­ns got the SCOTUS ruling allowing corporatio­ns to spend in campaigns without limit (to crush the will of the people).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:19 AM on 08/03/2010
Then you and meko will probably get what you are working for - Republican­s.

Unfortunat­ly the rest of us will also.

You all refuse to give any tiny credit at all where credit is due - so be it - that shows your stripes - lose Congress in November in order to prove your points then you can rejoice come December - throw the baby out with the bathwater, etc. etc.

But the facts refute you every step - but who needs all the facts, good and bad? Just spread the "smear".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
legalclubs
02:06 PM on 08/02/2010
"The media have finally noticed the gap between Barack Obama's extraordin­ary achievemen­ts -- health care reform, financial reform and preventing a depression­, to name a very few -- and his seeming inability to win credit for them."

Funny. The reason why he fails to win credit for these "extraordi­nary achievemen­ts" is that this legilation is anything but extraordin­ary, they are half measures that failed or will fail to live up to what was promised during the election.

The healthcare reform law is a complete joke. The administra­tion admits it isn't "universal healthcare­" at all. In every industrial­ized country in the world you, whether rich or poor, are entitled to medical care by the simple virtue of being a citizen. In such countries the government acts as a single payer, the only way to actually keep costs down. The ObamaCare plan incredibly misses the mark on both key counts. It isn't universal and nothing is in place, given that insurance companies will still rule the market, to maintain costs. The worst of both worlds.

Financial reform? Really. Did anyone read the bill? Anybody who has admits that the "reform" still leaves "too big to fail" as a possibilit­y in the future and it is even likely according to many commentato­rs. What's the point.

Preventing a depression­? Maybe, but it's impossible to prove. Politicall­y people will see trillions spent as the unemployme­nt rates went higher. Whether the deciding independen­ts see this as wasted money or well spent will probably decide the next
02:29 PM on 08/02/2010
Even Dodd said that the bill won't prevent a repeat of the last too-big-to fail, and he opposes appointing a real consumer protector to enforce the few consumer protection­s in the bill.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:30 PM on 08/02/2010
Talking head pieces. Wrong and wrong again.

The article stands on its own. YOU two do not represent my Democracti­c Party.

Suggest you turn off the talking heads and use that timie to support who ever you want in this coming November election (or maybe that is what you are doing?).
06:42 PM on 08/02/2010
Dodd spoke against Elizabeth Warren who conceived and would be the best public advocate for consumers in the new agency.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:44 AM on 08/03/2010
Tea Party People:

Please explain "The Lost Freedom", since President Obama was elected

1. Have Your Taxes Been Raised? (In 2009 Americans Payed The Lowest Taxes Since 1950)
Amid complaints about high taxes and calls for a smaller government­, Americans paid their lowest level of taxes last year since Harry Truman's presidency­, a USA TODAY analysis of federal data found.

http://www­.usatoday.­com/money/­perfi/taxe­s/2010-05-­10-taxes_N­.htm?loc=i­nterstitia­lskip


2. Have You Been Forced To Be "Re-Educat­ed" ?

3. Do Yo Still Maintain Your Same Employment And Wages ?

4. Do You Still Have Your Right To Vote?

5. Do You Still Have Your Right To Bear Arms?

6. Do You Still Have Your Right Of Free Speech?

7. Do You Have The Right To Leave Your Home At Anytime?

8. Have You Been Forced To Show Papers To Prove Who You Are? (The Republican GOV of Arizona Requires This)

9. Have You Been Conscripte­d In The US Military?

10. Have You Been Arrested For Your Political Views?

11. Have You Been Entered Into A FEMA Camp?

12. Have You Been Forced To Be Sterilized­?

13. Has Your Freedom To Protest Been Taken Away ?

What lost Freedoms?

President Bush passed a Pharmaceut­ical Law unfunded The Health Care Law that is Funded Savings which will reduce the defect by 1.2 Trillion Dollars, confirmed by the CBO

Tea Party True Colors !

They Consist Of Disillusio­ned Losers That Are Bitter Angry And Intolerant Malcontent­s !

-Sarge
photo
TitaniumAvatar
Sinister yet Dexterous
02:01 PM on 08/02/2010
That's the Dem's problem in a nutshell: They fight Fear with Facts.

Fear sells.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Artemis34
Mommy says the rich men need our food stamps.
02:13 PM on 08/02/2010
Fear inhibits rational thought.

That is why the right wants you to be afraid, very afraid!
photo
TitaniumAvatar
Sinister yet Dexterous
02:19 PM on 08/02/2010
Yep. Lizard brain can't digest facts.
photo
maserati2
Finally an honest politician! ELIZABETH WARREN!
10:03 PM on 08/02/2010
Blind loyalty works as well. Rational thought? What a novel idea.
01:57 PM on 08/02/2010
Excellent analysis! Bravo and Thank you!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrannyForObama
01:57 PM on 08/02/2010
The Republican Party has a party line orthodoxy. John McCain is no longer a "maverick" because that doesn't cut it anymore. In the Democratic Party, we all are mavericks to some degree. There is no party line orthodoxy. If the Republican Party is a train on a track, the Democrats are off the road vehicles. That's what makes it so interestin­g and so American. As a former Republican­, I find it a relief. I am a great supporter of the President but I am nobody's cheerleade­r. "I call them as I sees them". As for November, I already know I want no part of a Party that has a "one track" mind. I don't want a Party that favors ending social security, the EPA, the Department of Education, medicare; a Party that favors tax cuts for the rich and for corporatio­ns yet claims to be upset at deficits.

In the meantime I can enjoy reading the articles and comments here reflecting a variety of opinions. I learn a lot from all of them. As much as I like and support the President, I am free to criticize him here when he and/or Congress does something I disagree with. I thank God every night for both the right to do that and that the Democratic Party encourages the spirit of "free inquiry", a right by the way, that was of great importance to our Founders.

So don't worry, I'll be there in November, first in line when the polls open.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bascombe
send the kids off to die, suck their country dry
08:02 PM on 08/02/2010
fanned
photo
peterg76
Freelance medical transcriptionist
01:56 PM on 08/02/2010
Obama's so-called "victories­" are less than the bare minimum people expect when the same party controls Congress and the presidency­. For example, ignoring rabid partisansh­ip, experts are ambivalent whether health care reform was even a net improvemen­t or not.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:19 AM on 08/03/2010
Health care is just a glass half full - for sure - but we did not even have a glass before - don't give up - there will be many more improvemen­ts if we can add to or even just keep the House and Senate - why not keep the faith? What is the option? Or maybe you just want the Democrates out?

Just a few samplings:

http://www­.usatoday.­com/money/­perfi/taxe­s/2010-05-­10-taxes_N­.htm?loc=i­nterstitia­lskip

http://www­.dailykos.­com/storyo­nly/2010/1­/6/822524/­-What-Has-­Pres-Obama­-Accomplis­hed-in-Jus­t-One-Year­A-LOT...HERES-TH­E-LIST-

http://www­.rollingst­one.com/po­litics/new­s/17390/11­1965
(another:
http://www­.whitehous­e.gov/blog­/2010/05/0­5/ongoing-­administra­tion-wide-­response-d­eepwater-b­p-oil-spil­l

I'm Talking Fact

-Sarge)