NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Zachary Stockill

Zachary Stockill

Posted: September 21, 2010 01:40 PM

Chances are that if you follow this or any other comprehensive news source, you are aware of Christopher Hitchens' rapidly declining health. I daresay I wasn't the only one to be taken aback by the speed with which illness has overtaken the author's physical form. His interviews with Anderson Cooper and Charlie Rose have displayed a once-virile human being worn down by cancer; that inexhaustible source of misery throughout the entire world. Though his intellect remains voracious and his wit razor-sharp, his face betrays a body exhausted by chemotherapy, and utterly bored by the prospect of an early exit from this party (and to his mind, almost certainly no entry into any "next"). Some sort of thinly-veiled, preemptive eulogy on my part would be both cheap and offensive. Instead, I offer a brief attestation to the influence he has had on one aspiring writer, in joining the chorus of well-wishes for one of the most important public intellectuals of our time.

Chances are also strong that, like myself, at least one of the people reading these words has been impacted by Hitchens' intellectual courage in a profound way. Like Hitchens, from a very young age my political sympathies have largely fallen under the umbrella of "the Left;" one half of the tedious, overly simplistic division of the political spectrum. However, I have always tried to overlook those Right-Left distinctions as arbitrary and largely irrelevant -- one person's politics should not be so simplistic as to fit so neatly into such categories. All too often the politically engaged revert to impulsive responses that fit neatly within their own "camp," be it liberal or conservative, Marxist or fascist, anarchic or libertarian, etc. For the subheadings of "liberal" and "conservative" largely overlook values common to all sides, and instead encourage partisanship and discord where cooperation is entirely within the realm of possibility. Likewise, these categories do not encourage the type of thoughtful and productive debate, at the political and popular level, necessary for a thriving democracy, and so sorely lacking from contemporary political discourse. For these reasons, I reject the impulse to qualify myself as entirely "liberal," tempting though, for purposes of simplicity, or even community, it is often to do so. Hitchens' own life and work was a major inspiration for me to adopt this position. If nothing else, Christopher Hitchens has always encouraged his audiences to think, which is the ultimate accomplishment of any writer.

His decision to support the 2003 Iraq War was extremely unpopular with his "base" of traditional readership (among those the Tea Party considers the "socialists," "Marxists," or my personal favorite, "Fascist-socialists." What a curious hybrid). Whether or not you agreed with Hitchens' position on Iraq, it is difficult to deny that quite aside from being the most articulate, his was the most intelligent call to arms; and at a time when it was sorely lacking on both the Right, and Left. I opposed the US-led incursion into Iraq, and still feel unequivocally that the war has been an absolute calamity for the Iraqi people, not to mention the thousands of coalition forces forced to pay the ultimate price. However, Christopher Hitchens challenged me and many others to consider the immense cost involved with leaving Saddam Hussein in power indefinitely at a time when it was extremely unpopular on "the Left" to do so. Jane Kenway and Johannah Fahey describe an important public intellectual's thought as "provocative.. it unsettles, inspires, invites untrammeled thought." Using the limited example of Iraq, Hitchens meets, and exceeds all of these criteria.

His recent memoir, Hitch-22, while no doubt sympathetic to its main subject, reveals a man who has usually taken the time to fully consider, and more importantly reconsider his political positions time and time again. In an age where any thoughtful reconsideration of one's positions is caustically deemed "flip-flopping" by punditry on the Right and Left, "Hitch" is a rarity. Posterity will primarily champion Hitchens as a major force in confronting religious extremism and terrorism in all forms. But more than that, Christopher Hitchens remains one of the foremost champions of independent judgment; an accomplishment, I argue, far more impressive and ultimately valuable for humanity.

Thus, it is with this in mind that I wish Christopher Hitchens a swift recovery, and many more years of inspiring me, and many others, to truly consider our positions.

 

Follow Zachary Stockill on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ZachStock

Chances are that if you follow this or any other comprehensive news source, you are aware of Christopher Hitchens' rapidly declining health. I daresay I wasn't the only one to be taken aback by the s...
Chances are that if you follow this or any other comprehensive news source, you are aware of Christopher Hitchens' rapidly declining health. I daresay I wasn't the only one to be taken aback by the s...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:14 PM on 09/27/2010
Thanks for the column. I think Hitchens' influence on a generation of young leftists was profound. His "Minority Report" column in The Nation was required reading for me and my student activist friends in the late 1980s/early 1990s. We cheered when he was on television and left his lectures inspired to confront injustice. His trenchant criticism of Clinton was a breath of fresh air for those of us who believed that leftists should never apologize for centrists. His acerbic wit was a strong antidote to the "nuts and berries" types on the left. His crisp arguments caused many conservatives to fumble for words. Hitchens made being on the left fun.

Then there was and always will be the pure pleasure of reading him, the master of the English language, whether his subject is Orwell, human rights abuses in the Balkans or the battle between reason and religion.

The world is a better place with Christopher Hitchens in it.
02:48 PM on 09/26/2010
Some of us are contributing in the name of Hitch to research to fight cancer as an alternate to useless prayer. see: http://richarddawkins.net/discussions/525008-hitch-something-more-meaningful-than-prayer
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:44 AM on 09/23/2010
LONG-LIVE HITCH!
photo
Ellen Hart
Ellen Hart is the author of 28 crime novels in two
03:19 PM on 09/22/2010
I've been following everything I can on Hitchens. I can't tell you how deeply his illness has affected me. Hitch 22 showed us a man often of two minds, someone who could, perhaps lamentably for
him, see both sides of an issue. That is his Hitch 22 -- that and the need he saw to break with
his chosen philosophical comrades over Iraq. At the very least, the reason he stated for his
support for the war had moral heft and, had Bush used it, might have persuaded me, although
I believe that, in the end, it was a horrific decision. I truly love Hitchens. I think the loss of his
voice, whenever that day comes, will be huge--for the world, and for me.
02:05 PM on 09/22/2010
I, too, have been unnaturally upset by Hitchens' illness, as I discussed here -- when I got a little weepy thinking about it on a place. http://ow.ly/2Ihv5
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Zachary Stockill
04:58 PM on 09/22/2010
Thanks for sharing. I don't necessarily disagree with your classification of Hitchens as the most gifted polemicist alive in the English language.
09:21 AM on 09/22/2010
Hang in there Hitch; we need you.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lev Raphael
Author of "Book Lust!"
08:07 AM on 09/22/2010
A brilliant, demanding, probing writer--and often darkly hilarious, but even his rhetoric could not convince me that we needed "to consider the immense cost involved with leaving Saddam Hussein in power indefinitely." This was not our decision to make, and Andrew Bacevich among many others makes a good case for how misguided we are in this misadventure in "Washington Rules."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Zachary Stockill
11:46 AM on 09/22/2010
Just to play Bush II's advocate for a moment: precisely whose "decision" was it to make? If we can agree that Saddam Hussein was a ruthless tyrant, was there an indigenous Iraqi resistance front (without US assistance) with the power to overthrow Saddam in 2003? The answer is almost certainly no. I'm the last person to argue in support of the Iraq War, but the question remains.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lev Raphael
Author of "Book Lust!"
02:14 PM on 09/22/2010
Nobody's decision. We simply do not have the right to impose our will on the rest of the world. I'm with Andrew Bacevich on this question, and Chalmers Johnson.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ann Starke
Progressive old broad
01:59 AM on 09/22/2010
One of the things I respect most about Hitchens is his ability to change his mind. This is something that has been demonized by narrow-minded pundits who live and die by the consistency of their opinions, whether right or left, right or wrong. I shake my head as they hold on to their opinions year after year, like grim death, for fear that someone will say that they flip-flopped. .
If, in life, one does not learn, and grow, and change, how can anyone evolve? I have been a Republican, Libertarian, Roman Catholic, Deist, Jesus Freak, and am now a progressive Democrat and open-minded spiritual seeker. I do not know where I will be when I leave this life. But I hope that I will keep learning and keep being open to learning.
Aside from his determination that there is no God, Hitchens chooses to learn and grow and change. I hope that he is given many more years to continue his journey.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William D Simpson
04:13 PM on 09/21/2010
Many intellectuals have labored their lifetimes to disprove the existence of GOD. Through science and academia, government and media, literature, arts and entertainment.
Men such as Albert Einstein, Charles Darwin, and Earnest Hemingway, of yesterday, to Stephen Hawking and Christopher Hitchens, of today. Who have contributed greatly to the firm establishment of humanism upon the conscience of today’s post-modern culture.

http://wsimpson.wordpress.com/2010/09/21/reason-awakened-to-creations-god/
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jesse Kornbluth
02:43 PM on 09/21/2010
Recovery?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Zachary Stockill
04:47 PM on 09/21/2010
I recognize how unlikely it is, however I feel the sentiment couldn't hurt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
02:28 PM on 09/21/2010
I hope he beats his cancer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DamonIcke
Boognish Disciple
02:17 PM on 09/21/2010
Hitchens is well-read, has been everywhere in the world and has no allegiance with any political party, which make him a great source for information and honesty. We need more people like him.
photo
JohnFromCensornati
The End is near
01:58 PM on 09/21/2010
Hitchens is the best. I *always* read his column even if I'm not interested in the subject he's written about.