How was the international reaction to the Fed's massive quantitative easing plan? Decidedly not good.
The Fed's program, in which it will buy up to $600 billion in new U.S. debt (as a part of a $900 billion plan, as HuffPost's Shahien Nasiripour reported), has been criticized by foreign leaders as potentially damaging to the world economy. "With all due respect, U.S. policy is clueless," Germany's finance minister, Wolfgang Schaeuble, said Friday, according to Reuters.
Although he didn't go into much detail, Schaeuble said the issues that the Fed's policy attempts to address are not the country's fundamental problems. Quantitative easing is designed to lower interest rates: It makes the yield on Treasury bonds go down, and then lower rates spread, in theory, to the rest of the economy. In Schaeuble's words, it promotes liquidity, or the ease with which money moves around. It also promotes inflation, which, like low interest rates, theoretically encourages people to spend money now.
"With short-term interest rates already about as low as they can go, the FOMC agreed to deliver that support by purchasing additional longer-term securities," Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke wrote in a recent op-ed.
The blog Zero Hedge provides a helpful metaphor for understanding what, in its opinion, the Fed is doing: "Our Government Is Like a Plumber Trying to Fill the Bathtub by Pouring in More and More Water ... Without Plugging the Drain."
Europe's central bank issued an implicit criticism of Bernanke's policy when ECB head Jean-Claude Trichet decided he would not follow suit. And although French finance minister Christine Lagarde didn't complain outright, she doesn't seem happy with the Fed's move.
"The euro bears the brunt of the move," she said Thursday, according to the Wall Street Journal. "I am not making a judgment on the U.S. quantitative easing," she added. "But it shows the imperative need to rethink the international monetary system and cooperation mechanisms."
Other world leaders also expressed criticisms. The head of China's central bank, Zhou Xiaochuan, said on Friday that the U.S. policy should take the world economy into consideration. "If the domestic policy is optimal policy for the United States alone, but at the same time it is not an optimal policy for the world, it may bring a lot of negative impact to the world," he said, according to AP.
China itself could be accused of such self-centered thinking, since it maintains a cap on the value of its currency, to the detriment, critics say, of the world economy. But if the value of the U.S. currency were to fall, it would, by definition, cause the relative value of China's to rise.
Another official at China's central bank, adviser Xia Bin, appealed to "wise Westerners" to sympathize with China's plight. "As long as the world exercises no restraint in issuing global currencies such as the dollar -- and this is not easy -- then the occurrence of another crisis is inevitable, as quite a few wise Westerners lament," he wrote, according to Reuters.
Brazil, too, isn't happy. The head of the country's central bank, Henrique Meirelles, doesn't like the idea of easy money. "QE creates excessive liquidity that flows over to countries like Brazil," he said, according to Reuters. "Definitely, for Brazil it does create a problem."
Investor Jim Rogers, for his part, had a colorful way of describing America's central banker: "Dr. Bernanke unfortunately does not understand economics, he does not understand currencies, he does not understand finance," he said Thursday, according to Bloomberg. "His whole intellectual career has been based on the study of printing money.
"Give the guy a printing press, he's going to run it as fast as he can."
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.