By Sean Martin, Golfweek
MEDINAH, Ill. – The search is on. With the Ryder Cup complete, those who had pinned their hopes on the American side now will look, like a forlorn lover, for the one that got away, the single point that kept the United States from completing what had been a successful week at Medinah.
Criticism is expected in the wake of such a loss. What could’ve been done to avoid such dramatic defeat? It really is quite simple. The United States’ play Sunday on Medinah’s final two holes cost the Americans the cup.
U.S. captain Davis Love III can expect to take some heat. The coach always is an easy target. The general manager never fires the star slugger when his team underperforms. The guy on the sidelines is the easier target.
Captains often are criticized for inflexibly adhering to a pre-tournament plan in light of unexpected results. Love definitely did that, but it was working. The United States started the final day with a 10-6 lead, the first time since 1981 that it scored 10 or more points before the singles session.
Should Love have played Phil Mickelson and Keegan Bradley, or at least just the 26-year-old Bradley, on Saturday afternoon? Should Steve Stricker have been replaced as Tiger Woods’ partner?
Yes. No captain will leave a Ryder Cup with an unblemished record, though. This loss can be pinned on one thing: the United States’ inability to close matches.
Five matches came to the 17th tee Sunday either all square or with the United States holding a 1-up lead. Europe won four of them, and halved Francesco Molinari’s match with Tiger Woods, which was completed after the cup had been decided. The United States didn’t turn a single match in its favor over the final two holes.
The Ryder Cup was within reach for the Europeans on the final day only because they turned Saturday’s final two matches in their favor. Sergio Garcia and Luke Donald beat Woods and Stricker, 1 up, in Saturday afternoon four-balls, with Donald holding the U.S. at bay by answering Woods’ short birdie at the 17th. Then there were Ian Poulter’s five consecutive birdies to turn Saturday’s final match from a 1-up U.S. lead into a European victory.
Mickelson defended Love’s decision to sit him and Bradley, the remarkable rookie, for the final team session, saying they had so invested themselves into their Saturday morning match, a 7-and-6 foursomes victory, that they were unprepared for an afternoon match.
This is the Ryder Cup, though. If you can’t summon your best golf for this event, when can you? One could possibly understand the 42-year-old Mickelson needing a rest, but Bradley? Just watch the way he walked down Medinah’s fairways, always leaning forward, pressing into the challenge ahead. He would’ve done anything asked of him.
Mickelson and Bradley had played only 44 holes in three matches, including 12 on Saturday. Methinks they could’ve made it. There’s no guarantee that Mickelson and Bradley, as unbelievable as they had been, would have won again, though. That’s the problem with hindsight. They could’ve been the ones on the other end of Poulter’s bug-eyed celebrations.
It was worth a try, though. Mickelson said they needed rest for Sunday singles. Well-rested, both lost.
Perhaps Bradley could’ve paired with Woods in the final team session. This isn’t 1999 or 2002. Woods isn’t the same intimidating presence who makes even his own teammates nervous.
Love didn’t want to mix up his lineup, though. His team was split into six pairs that remained intact through practice rounds and the team matches. Each player had just one partner for the week. Woods could’ve used help, though. Stricker was struggling.
There are dangers with the woulda, coulda, shoulda game, though. Even if Love had made different decisions, there’s no guarantee they would’ve produced additional points.
There is one thing that’s certain, though: The U.S. started singles with an advantage it hadn’t seen in more than 30 years, but its inability to perform on Medinah’s final two holes cost it the Ryder Cup. And no captain could have fixed that. That falls on the men between the ropes.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.