As threats of a crippling cyberattack against the United States have mounted, the Obama administration has pushed repeatedly for stronger digital defenses while remaining quiet about its own hacking arsenal.
But in a rare public disclosure this week, a top general acknowledged that the United States is focused not only on playing defense on the cyber battlefield -- it is also bolstering its offense.
Gen. Keith Alexander, who runs the Pentagon's Cyber Command, told Congress on Tuesday that he is establishing 13 teams of experts to carry out cyberattacks against foreign countries that target the United States with destructive computer code.
“I would like to be clear that this team, this defend-the-nation team, is not a defensive team,” Alexander told the House Armed Services Committee. “This is an offensive team that the Defense Department would use to defend the nation if it were attacked in cyberspace."
While Alexander made his comments to Congress, several experts interpreted his remarks to be directed abroad, serving as a veiled threat to foreign adversaries that could persuade them to negotiate a cyber arms treaty with the United States.
James Lewis, a senior fellow and director of technology policy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said he hopes Alexander's remarks will convince other countries to be more forthcoming about their hacking skills.
"Russia and China have powerful cyber capabilities, but they won't talk about them," Lewis said. "That's what worries me."
Alexander's comments came one day after a White House official demanded that the Chinese government, which has been accused of sponsoring cyberespionage against American companies, agree to “acceptable norms of behavior in cyberspace." But Lewis noted that China is not the only country to worry about -- about a dozen countries have the capacity to launch cyberattacks against the U.S., he said.
Alan Paller, director of research at the SANS Institute, a nonprofit security research and education organization, echoed Lewis' hope that other countries may now be persuaded to disclose their cyberweaponry. He added that Alexander's comments may help pave the way for a potential cyber arms treaty.
"When we wanted to have nuclear arms treaties, we had to share our capabilities," Paller said. "You can't have an arms treaty if you don’t know what the other guys have. This may be the first step."
Col. Rivers Johnson, spokesman for the Pentagon's Cyber Command, did not return a request for comment about the general's comments.
Alexander's remarks coincided with those of James R. Clapper Jr., the nation’s top intelligence official, who warned Congress on Tuesday that a potential cyberattack that cripples the country's power grids, communications networks and financial systems poses a greater threat to the United States than global terrorist cells.
The United States has carried out one known cyberattack against another country, when President Barack Obama secretly ordered an attack that damaged Iran's nuclear facility. U.S. officials have never publicly acknowledged their role in the attack, known as Stuxnet, and have said little about America's offensive cyber muscle ever since.
But last summer, the Air Force made a rare public call for contractors to develop "cyberspace warfare attack" capabilities. And last month, The New York Times reported that a secret legal review concluded that Obama has the power to order a pre-emptive cyberattack if the United States has evidence that another country has targeted it with destructive computer code.
Now, the U.S. military is creating teams of hackers to carry out those pre-emptive cyberattacks. And by disclosing that publicly, Alexander may deter foreign adversaries from launching attacks in the first place, said Roger Cressey, a former White House cybersecurity and counterterrorism official.
"When you talk about it publicly, there is an element of deterrence," he said. "It's putting other countries on notice that a potential cyberattack will be responded to."
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.