NEW YORK -- Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) introduced legislation to strengthen email privacy protections on Tuesday, giving bipartisan flavor to the push to reform the outdated Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) of 1986.
The combination of Leahy, a Democrat from the Green Mountain State, and Lee, a libertarian-leaning Republican from the West, mirrors a diverse coalition in the House of Representatives that introduced a similar bill earlier this month.
Just as ECPA action heats up, however, a House hearing provided a preview of law enforcement's objections.
Under the law currently in place, law enforcement officials need only a subpoena -- not a warrant -- to access email or other electronic communications stored online that are older than 180 days or have already been opened. That effectively means that if you use web-based cloud email, many or most of the emails in your inbox could be accessed by law enforcement on their say-so.
"No one could have imagined just how the Internet and mobile technologies would transform how we communicate and exchange information today," said Leahy, who originally authored ECPA in 1986, in a statement. "Three decades later, we must update this law to reflect new privacy concerns and new technological realities."
Leahy introduced a similar bill last year, but after passing out of his committee it did not come up for a vote on the Senate floor. Outside of Congress, the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for Tax Reform launched a new partnership on Monday to push for reform. Online heavyweights like Amazon, Apple, eBay, Google and Twitter all support creating a warrant standard.
Just what kind of an update the law will get, however, will be a topic of debate as legislation moves forward. In a House Judiciary subcommittee meeting on the topic Tuesday, a top Justice Department official admitted there was "no principled basis" to make a distinction between emails that are older than 180 days and more recent ones.
But the official, acting Assistant Attorney General Elana Tyrangiel, also said that while the idea of requiring a warrant for email has "considerable merit," Congress should also consider special cases in which a subpoena could be required instead, such as non-criminal civil rights and antitrust investigations.
Allowing a subpoena in such circumstances, while requiring one for criminal cases, would be "two steps forward and two steps back," Hanni Fakhoury, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told CNET.
Local law enforcement, meanwhile, seems less than thrilled about a toughened warrant standard for emails. Claiming that the debate over ECPA reform "has been largely one-sided to date," Richard Littlehale of the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation warned in the House hearing that "any restriction of law enforcement's access to that information ... may well come at a price, and some of that price could be paid by our most vulnerable citizens."
Perhaps of most concern to civil liberties advocates was Littlehale's apparent suggestion that the warrant requirement would be more palatable if law enforcement had access to other types of data. He said he would like to force cell phone providers to store text message data for investigations, because "text messaging often plays a big role in investigations related to domestic violence, stalking, menacing, drug trafficking and weapons trafficking."
Chris Calabrese, legislative counsel in the Washington office of the ACLU, said his organization opposes that idea.
"Just think about the contents of your text messages and how much sensitive, personal and valuable information is contained there," he said. "Imagine the government turning that into a permanent log that they, or private investigators or divorce attorneys, could look at at any time in the future."
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.