In a dramatic ending to a months-long trial, jurors tasked with deciding whether or not to convict several top former members of Rupert Murdoch's media empire on phone hacking charges reached a split decision on Monday. They declared Andy Coulson—a former editor of the News of the World who also served as Prime Minister David Cameron's chief spin doctor— guilty, while Rebekah Brooks, the former head of Murdoch's British newspaper holdings, was cleared of all charges.
Coulson's conviction represents a serious blow to Murdoch. He is the most senior figure thus far to be declared guilty during the hacking scandal. But Brooks's acquittal is an equally major victory; she was a more pivotal player in Murdoch's company, and was much more closely associated with him.
Coulson was convicted on one count of conspiring to hack phones. He and another defendant, former News of the World reporter Clive Goodman, were still awaiting to hear their verdicts on two other counts.
Brooks was cleared of four charges, including phone hacking, the bribing of public officials, and the obstruction of the police investigation into her activity.
She was reportedly so emotional at the verdict that she needed help in leaving the courtroom.
Her husband, Charlie, was also cleared of the charges against him, as were several other defendants.
Watch video of Brooks leaving the courtroom:
The verdict put immediate political pressure on Cameron, who hired Coulson to be his communications director even though reporters working for him at the News of the World had already been jailed for phone hacking. Coulson resigned from that post in early 2011 as the pressure over hacking increased. In a statement, Cameron said he was "profoundly sorry" for having hired Coulson.
"It was obviously wrong to employ him," he said. "I gave someone a second chance. It turned out to be a bad decision."
The marathon trial lasted from November until June. It was one of the longest criminal trials in British history, and one of the most serious challenges for Murdoch since the scandal exploded in 2011.
The court heard about everything from an affair between Brooks and Coulson to Tony Blair's close relationship with the Murdoch empire. A stream of celebrities, including Sienna Miller and Jude Law, testified.
Prosecutors emphasized the huge scale of the hacking that was taking place, with thousands of people having their voicemails criminally intercepted. They portrayed Brooks, Coulson and their associates as active conspirators in the criminality going on at News International (now called News UK). One lawyer told jurors they would have to think Brooks was a "fool" if she was unaware of what was going on at her newspapers.
The defendants denied every charge, saying they had been completely in the dark about the corruption happening all around them.
Jurors clearly believed Brooks when she said she had been uninvolved in phone hacking, but did not believe Coulson.
In one of his most damning moments, Coulson admitted that, in 2004, he listened to a voicemail left by David Blunkett, then the country's home secretary. He insisted that he did not know how the reporter who played him the message had obtained it.
Coulson now faces up to two years in prison.
In a statement, a spokesman for News UK tried to move on from the day's events.
"We said long ago, and repeat today, that wrongdoing occurred, and we apologized for it. We have been paying compensation to those affected and have cooperated with investigations," the statement read in part.
However, even as the dust settled on the trial, a new challenge emerged for Murdoch, as the Guardian reported that London police are set to question him over phone hacking. It seems that, for News Corp, the troubles caused by phone hacking never end.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.