NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Kids who attended full-day preschool programs were more ready for kindergarten and had fewer absences than kids who attended half-day preschool programs, according to a new study.
It is surprising that full-day preschoolers performed better in many different domains, including language, math, socio-emotional and physical health, according to lead author Arthur J. Reynolds of the Institute of Child Development and Human Capital Research Collaborative at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis.
Full-day preschoolers also had 45 percent fewer chronic absences than half-day preschoolers, he noted.
Reynolds and his coauthors evaluated preschoolers at the end of the 2012-2013 school year in 11 Chicago schools, including predominantly black or Hispanic children age four to five.
For the full-day program, 409 kids attended the Child-Parent Center for seven hours a day, while 573 kids had attended the three-hour version of the program.
Kids in the seven-hour programs scored higher on language, math, socio-emotional development, and physical health tests, though the differences were modest in some cases.
Literacy and thinking skill scores were similar for both groups, according to results in JAMA.
Full-day kids had fewer absences than kids in the three-hour programs.
Around half of the kids in the full-day programs were 'chronically absent,' missing at least 10 percent of school days, compared to almost 72 percent of kids in half-day programs.
Full-day preschoolers averaged 936 hours of instruction for the year, compared to 418 hours for the half-day preschoolers, more than double the hours of instruction, Reynolds noted.
"The general expectation is that greater exposure to a good program should yield better results than lesser exposure, and this study is an example of that," said Lawrence J. Schweinhart of the HighScope Educational Research Foundation in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
"But some studies have not confirmed this general expectation, probably because the programs were not so good," he told Reuters Health by email.
Schweinhart wrote an editorial about the results.
The measured differences in school readiness were equivalent to a four to five month advantage for the full-day group, Reynolds said. More than 80 percent of full-day preschoolers met national norms for total school readiness compared to 59 percent of half-day preschoolers.
It is possible, but very unlikely, that kids in the full-day program might be different from kids in the half-day program in other ways that would explain the advantage in school readiness, Reynolds told Reuters Health by email.
"We focused on children in the same schools and they had equivalent performance at the beginning of the year and were similar in many characteristics," he said.
Cost is the main drawback of full-day preschool programs, which are nearly double the cost of part-day programs, he said.
"Higher income families have this choice, but most lower income families that rely on state pre-k or school programs don't have much choice," Reynolds said.
Typical state pre-k or head start programs are only part-day, he said.
"Our study shows the advantages of increasing the availability of full-day publicly funded programs," he said. "Not enough full-day programs are available today, especially that are high in quality."
The Midwest Child-Parent Center program in this study has highly qualified teachers, small classes, active learning opportunities, many supports for families, and support for staff that are essential for high quality learning experiences, he noted.
As the study only included preschoolers, it did not link kindergarten readiness with later academic performance or other measures of success.
"I have my doubts that the added value of full-day over part-day found in this study will show up in longer-term results," Schweinhart said.
But preschool will likely lead to better long-term results than no preschool, he said.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1xYwLk6 JAMA, online November 25, 2014.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.