Did The 2014 <em>Sports Illustrated</em> Swimsuit Cover Go Too Ménage-à-Far?

When I went to the newsstand to grab my annual copy -- the 50th Anniversary issue, no less -- I nearly had a heart attack.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

As someone who was raised in South Florida, I owned more bathing suits than any other article of clothing. To this day, even though I live much farther North than my beloved Miami, I still own a ridiculous amount of bathing suits. OK, so now that I have stated my case for my love of bathing suits, it will not sound nearly as weird when I say that I look forward to the Sports Illustrated Swim Suit issue every year. I look to it for the trends in bathing suits and inspiration to get my butt in shape. So when I went to the newsstand to grab my annual copy -- the 50th Anniversary issue, no less -- I nearly had a heart attack. Staring back at me were three topless chicks with their hands on each other's nearly bare asses. What the hell?

2014-02-24-SISwimSuit2014.JPG


This cover is such a let-down. What's more, it's the most tasteless photo throughout the entire magazine. Why did they pick it? To sell magazines, I get that. But to whom? Everyone, I guess, because everyone can reach up and buy it. I did. Yes, I bought it. I had to, it's the 50th anniversary edition of a magazine I have been buying for 20 years. I bought my first issue when I was 16. That was in 1994. The Dream Team was on the cover. Elle Macpherson, Kathy Ireland and Rachel Hunter. WEARING COMPLETE BATHING SUITS!

I am desperate for this post not to be a case of me being a prude, or a mid-thirties "just jealous" bitch or a mom ranting, because this is not about me, it's about three naked chicks on the cover of a magazine at the checkout lanes of the supermarket, for all to see. Most of all, tweens and teens. This should not be an image Sports Illustrated is portraying! I expect this from Playboy, NOT SI! I am so disappointed.

I feel for the parents trying to raise girls in this environment. I remember the pressures of being a tween/teen and wanting to be a popular girl. I realize now how much easier I had it than the girls of today. I didn't have sex driving the rules of popularity. I just needed to know how to tight roll my jeans, stay relatively thin and apply makeup. Most of all, I had to be smart and funny and fun to be around. Today, it seems the recipe for a girl to be trendy and popular is to look like she got attacked by a makeup counter and the ability to pull her t-shirt down just enough to cover her ass. Such a shame.

Is there a way to fix this? Probably not. Do the parents of today have a constant uphill battle? Absolutely. The only saving grace is knowing the days of big fake breasts came and went, so hopefully, tweens dressing like strippers will too. I know there are parents out there winning this battle. I see tweens and teens out there dressed in 'age-appropriate' outfits. To those parents, I applaud you. I know it cannot be easy. I imagine magzine covers like these cannot be making your job any easier.

And finally, to Sports Illustrated, SHAME ON YOU! You sell a version of your magazine for children, and because of that kids look up to your name and magazines. What the hell is wrong with you? I imagine you would have no trouble selling this magazine with a more tasteful cover, yet you went dumpster diving to the pits of shame and pulled this one out. And for 50th Anniversary issue? I am scared to see what you come up with next year. I mean, how could you possibly top three naked girls?

Popular in the Community

Close

HuffPost Shopping’s Best Finds

MORE IN LIFE