It is an accepted truth in Washington D.C., in the mainstream media, and among our political thought leaders that Hillary Clinton is a better general election candidate for progressives than Bernie Sanders.
Bernie, the view goes, is a true progressive, but his ideas are too radical, his policy platforms, too liberal, to sway the tediously sought-after slice of undecided moderate voters who decide general elections. In an ideal world for progressives, Bernie would run the show, but we live in the real world, where short-term ideological sacrifices must be made for long-term practical progress. Supporting Hillary is the wise, mature decision.
But what if this view is incorrect? What if choosing the "safe" candidate during uncertain, "unsafe" times is a mistake?
The stakes of 2016 are undoubtedly high. The inevitable Supreme Court vacancies and subsequent presidential nominations that will occur from 2017 to 2021 provide reason alone for progressives to do everything in their power to ensure that Democrats hold the White House. Imagine a world with six or even seven conservative justices sitting on the bench. The right to get an abortion, to regulate carbon emissions, to collectively bargain, all of it could fall in one docket. Citizens United and the litany of anti-democratic Roberts Court rulings would be law for decades to come. In such polarizing times, it is frightening to imagine what kind of reactionary a Republican would nominate to the bench.
And to the continual surprise of DC insiders, it is looking more possible than ever that Trump could be that Republican. Progressives, instead of reveling in what appears to be good fortune, should be asking themselves why Trump has proven so resilient in the GOP primary, and what his rise -- regardless of whether it endures -- signifies for today's political zeitgeist.
"There is no distinctly American criminal class," Mark Twain once wrote, "except Congress." Now more than ever Twain's words ring true, and the American people know it. Washington DC has come to represent everything that is wrong in our country: a political class feeding at the trough of corruption. Koch-primaries, leadership PACs, toll-booth fees, the business of the nation's capital is a national disgrace.
Trump knows this, and Trump's strength is tied directly to it. He has routed every GOP presidential candidate by pointing out the absurdities of the American political system, and their involvement in it. "The Super PACs, they control all the candidates," he shouts, and the crowd goes wild.
If the primary waters settle and Trump and Clinton find each other face-to-face on the debate stage, Trump's talking points will write themselves. Hillary, he will shout, you worked tirelessly as the Secretary of State to forge the TPP, you voted for the Iraq War, your entire political career has been bankrolled by the FIRE sectors, you are the insider's insider!
Trump will shout these things, and he will, contrary to his character, be telling the truth. Hillary Clinton is an experienced candidate who has been unjustly vilified throughout her career for being a strong woman in a patriarchal society, but she is, without question, a paragon of DC politics.
Whether it is Donald Trump or Marco Rubio who brings up this fact is irrelevant. The Democratic Party is the incumbent party in the 2016 presidential race, and will face all of the challenges that this positions holds. Nominating an establishment candidate during this profoundly populist moment could prove to be a very risky "safe" bet.
Meanwhile, if Bernie Sanders were on that general election debate stage, the Republican opposition would be forced to battle over ideas, not character accusations predicated on the corruptibility of the political class. And we, as progressives, should welcome that; the American electorate is far more liberal than we are led to believe.
No one, not even Donald Trump, can successfully accuse Bernie Sanders of being beholden to big donors. And that independence -- or lack thereof -- may be the deciding factor of 2016.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.