A few weeks ago, frustrated with the general bullshit sexism surrounding Hillary Clinton in her second bid for the Presidency, I wrote a Facebook post outlining a history of what she's been told--or had said about her--in her lifetime. Although moderately popular among friends, I quickly forgot about it.
Inspired by Courtney Enlow's flat-out fantastic commentary on the same topic for Pajiba, I decided to post it here.
To be clear, I do not believe this represents all Bernie supporters. The Sanders campaign has passionately argued on a number of issues and attracted support from a variety of quarters, including some feminists. I respect that.
However, the current social media trope of "LOOK AT HILLARY PANDER TO THE KIDS LOL" is about as intellectually dishonest as it gets. No politician on the federal level has achieved their success without tailoring their message (and appearance) to the interests of the electorate. There's a reason Sanders talks so much about free college for everyone and economic inequality: because his core base of support lies in young voters.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with that, by the way. I may not agree with Sanders' approach, but I do agree with him that in a perfect world, college would be free for everyone. That's not the point here.
The point is that while every major male politician does pander, rarely do they get called out on it and none are as vociferously criticized for "pandering" as Hillary.
The tragedy of Hillary's career is that, unlike male politicians on her level, she has always had to tailor her appearance, tone, and cultural awareness to what America believes is appropriate for a woman.
1959: "Hillary, sweetie, girls can't be astronauts. Only boys can do that."
1965: "Hillary is very bright for a young woman, but she should act less ambitious."
1969: "I just think Hillary is too radical. And I don't like her glasses. Women typically don't look good in glasses."
1974: "That young woman is such a bitch. I'm fine with women being lawyers, but she needs to tone it down. Nixon is a good man, and she's helping smear his reputation."
1979: "She's the First Lady of Arkansas. Have some fucking pride. Stop looking like a frumpy old
hag. And what is with those glasses?"
1980: "Bill lost reelection for Governor because of Hillary. She's not feminine enough. I hate her."
1987: "I just can't stand her. Women shouldn't be more ambitious than their husbands. And have you seen how she dresses?"
1992: "Look, Bill. I'll put it to you straight: if you want to win this thing, Hillary has to look the part. She may cost you the election."
1994: "Why is the First Lady interfering in public policy? She needs to learn her place. Be a good hostess. Leave the policy to us. The men."
1992-2000: "Her hair looks awful. Now, it looks okay. Now, it looks awful again. Everyone comment on her hair. Why does she care so much about what people think of her hair?"
1998: "She's an evil, conniving bitch. This marriage is a sham. Why doesn't she dump him? I bet she's a lesbian."
2000: "She's running for the Senate? In New York? Does this woman have no shame?"
2003: "She looks weak. Women need to look the part. Wear something a bit more masculine."
2004: "She's so robotic. She has no soul. I know this because she wears pantsuits."
2005: "Her pantsuits are great, but I still hate her."
2006: "I hate her, and I don't know why, but I think it's the pantsuits."
2008: "I just wish she were more human. Who cares if the Senate is full of old white men who are just as serious."
2008: "She cried?! Politicians can't cry. So weak."
2008: "She should cry more. It would make her look more human."
2009: "Goodbye, State Department. That evil lesbian bitch who can't decide on her haircut is going to destroy this country."
2012: "Oh, look. Her hair changed again. What a surprise."
2012: "The Benghazi incident is directly related to her pantsuits. I'm sure of it."
2016: "Why does Hillary pander so much? Doesn't she know that all she has to do is be herself and Americans will accept her?"
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.