The BlogBusiness jobsworkers

On "Territorial" Taxation Issue, Don't Ignore U.S. Workers' Interests

Apple is a business and, as such, it seeks to maximize profits for its shareholders, not improve the living standards of average Americans. Unfortunately, policymakers tend to forget that basic reality when they are debating tax policy.
Chuck Marr
By 

Director of Federal Tax Policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Director of Federal Tax Policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

"We don't have an obligation to solve America's problems," an Apple executive told the New York Times in connection with Apple's decision to make the iPhone in China. "Our only obligation is making the best product possible."

To be sure, Apple is a business and, as such, it seeks to maximize profits for its shareholders -- not improve the living standards of average Americans. Unfortunately, policymakers tend to forget that basic reality when they are debating policy, especially tax policy.

Take the major effort by a number of corporations to convince Congress to adopt a "territorial" tax system, which would set U.S. taxes on corporate foreign profits at
zero.
Proponents claim it would make the United States more "competitive" with other countries, implying that we're all in this together. But although a territorial tax system might be good for corporate shareholders, it might not be good for America's workers. The Congressional Research Service's Jane Gravelle
told
Congress last year that it:

would make foreign investment more attractive. That would cause investment to flow abroad, and that would reduce the capital which workers in the United States have, so it should reduce wages. A capital flow reduces wages in the United States [and] increases the wages abroad.

Congress needs to remember the Apple executive's statement when considering the territorial proposal. The interests of U.S. multinationals merit consideration, but so, too, do the interests of average Americans.

Related Posts:

This blog post originally appeared on the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities' blog, Off the Charts (www.offthechartsblog.org).

Related

Business jobsworkerscorporate taxes
|
Submit a tip

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot