An Investment Riddle Rubix Cube Masters Can't Solve

This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

A globally diversified portfolio of index funds invested solely in stocks was down a whopping 40% in 2008. The same portfolio is up 19% in 2009, year to date.

Here is the data for a portfolio invested 60% in stocks and 40% in bonds:

2008: down 23%
2009 (YTD): up 10%

Raise your hand if your market beating broker or advisor told you to "flee to safety" at the end of 2007 and to get back into the market at the beginning of 2009 so that you would not miss the rally.

I am not seeing any hands.

My point exactly.

Brokers and advisors (and financial pundits) have no ability to time the markets or pick stocks. But that doesn't stop them from continuing to pretend they do. And it doesn't stop investors from relying on their flawed predictions.

Which brings me to the riddle:

Why do investors use market beating brokers and advisors?

I deal with this subject in this week's video.

The views set forth in this blog are the opinions of the author alone and may not represent the views of any firm or entity with whom he is affiliated. The data, information, and content on this blog are for information, education, and non-commercial purposes only. Returns from index funds do not represent the performance of any investment advisory firm. The information on this blog does not involve the rendering of personalized investment advice and is limited to the dissemination of opinions on investing. No reader should construe these opinions as an offer of advisory services. Readers who require investment advice should retain the services of a competent investment professional. The information on this blog is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities or class of securities mentioned herein.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot