If Ted Cruz and company's government shutdown exercise is exhibit A for what is ailing the Republican Party, Terry McAuliffe's victory over Ken Cuccinelli in Virginia's gubernatorial race should be exhibit B.
On the red state/blue state spectrum, Virginia is probably best described as magenta. Its hue is still more red than blue. Republicans should be able to win statewide -- especially against a Democrat with negatives as high as McAuliffe's -- but only if they field candidates whose appeal extends beyond the party's rightmost flank.
Any chance at fielding such a candidate was lost back in 2012, when the Virginia GOP decided to forego a statewide primary election and choose its nominee at the party convention -- where a small number of tea party activists could control the outcome and secure the nomination for Cuccinelli.
The candidate with broader appeal, Virginia Lieutenant Governor Bill Bolling, would have been favored in a primary, but the state's Republican voters never got a chance to choose.
Once again the Republican Party has shot itself in the foot by allowing an impassioned few from its fringe to have outsized influence. In this case, by nominating a deeply flawed candidate who has no crossover appeal and even turns off many of his fellow Republicans.
The problem with Cuccinelli and other tea party candidates is not that they are too conservative; it is that they are too radical.
Their strident opposition to the federal government, extreme partisanship, closed mindedness, and ideological zeal makes them either unable to win, or unable to prudently govern.
In Cuccinelli's case, perhaps nothing illustrates these traits better than his costly one man war on climate science.
Based solely on his own skepticism of climate science, Cuccinelli used his position as Attorney General to pursue a heavy-handed fraud investigation against a highly regarded climate scientist, Michael Mann, and the University of Virginia. His two-year effort was widely criticized as an intimidation tactic to squelch climate research and the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that Cuccinelli had overstepped his authority.
The fact that 95 percent of the world's climate scientists generally agree with Dr. Mann did not deter Cuccinelli, neither did lower court rulings against him, nor concern for the University's academic freedom.
That ill-advised investigation provided a solid foundation for his opponents to build on in casting Cuccinelli as too extreme, and according to a recent Washington Post story, also cost him the support of some big GOP donors.
Ken Cuccinelli now joins Christine O'Donnell, Sharron Angle, Todd Akin, and Richard Mourdock on the list of loses Republicans can attribute to tea party radicalism.
The obvious contrast is how easily Governor Chris Christie, who is both fiscally and socially conservative, cruised to victory in the very blue state of New Jersey.
Many in the media will no doubt try to explain this by casting Christie as "less conservative" than Cuccinelli, but such analysis would be wrong. Christie is the more conservative of the two.
The difference is that Christie is genuinely conservative, not radical. He holds views more in line with traditionalists conservatives like Edmund Burke, Russell Kirk and Ronald Reagan. He pursues prudent change, seeks to solve problems, works to gain consensus support for his goals, is open to new information, and governs with an attitude of service to all of his constituents.
Tea party candidates like Cuccinelli seek hasty and dramatic change, ignore problems that challenge their worldview, do not seek consensus, are closed minded, and tend to view the world through an "us versus them" lens.
Radicalism, be it from the left or the right, is not conservative.
Theodore Roosevelt once cautioned about following those "whose eyes are a little too wild to make it really safe to trust them."
It is time for the Republican Party to heed that advice and see tea party radicalism for the threat it is -- a threat not only to the Republican Party, but to the future of conservatism.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.