I've been thinking recently about the musical comedy, Little Me, which has a very funny script by Neil Simon. In one scene, an ocean liner is sinking, and the captain's assigning his officers various responsibilities. One officer's ordered to supervise the non-swimmers. Minutes later, the officer comes racing back with his report.
OFFICER: Sir, it's the non-swimmers.
CAPTAIN: What about them?
OFFICER: They're terrible swimmers.
Why am I thinking about that? Because of the sub-prime loan disaster, which you'd think could have very easily been foreseen. It's the same situation as in Little Me.
"Sir, it's the bad loan risks."
"They're terrible loan risks."
The sub-prime disaster was primarily the result of the people in the home loan business having a faulty understanding of the word "poor."
When I was a Sociology student in college, I once said that "Sociology is a discipline where they do a study proving conclusively that rich people have more money than poor people."
They didn't really do that study. That's just my opinion of Sociology, which was reflected again in a "comparative study" term paper I wrote entitled, "Crime and Height." That's a joke too. I didn't write that. I could have, though. It would have fit right in.
Returning to my point, the concept of "poor" is not all that difficult to understand. But, for some reason, smart people - and not just in the home loan business - are confused by the concept and its natural consequences. It seems to elude their understanding.
I remember once watching a discussion on This Week, when David Brinkley was still the host, concerning the issue of limiting the purchasing of television air time for political advertising. Conservative George Will's position was
"Everybody should be able to buy as much television air time as they want. Any limitation would be an infringement on their constitutionally-guaranteed right to free speech."
Will's position put me in mind of what, I believe, is a French saying that goes,
"A rich man has just as much right to sleep under a bridge as a poor man."
The line is funny, because the idea behind it doesn't make any sense. Whether he has the right to or not, a rich man doesn't need to sleep under a bridge
And a poor person, even though they have a right to buy as much television air time as a rich person, can't buy any television air time
To buy television air time, a poor person needs precisely that thing that poor people - by definition of the word "poor" - don't have. Without that thing, it's impossible for a poor person to buy television air time. I may have repeated myself there, but I, apparently, need to, because, for some people, the concept doesn't seem to be sinking in.
Here's what George Will leaves out:
"Poor" and "buy television air time" not fitting together results in a serious imbalance in the constitutional guaranteed right to free speech, producing a glaring inequality, which, I believe, infringes on another constitutional guarantee.
That seems kind of important, don't you think?
The idea of what it means to be poor really isn't that complicated. The poor get it right away. But for some reason, the rich seem to have trouble.
Maybe sociologists should have done that study.
Earl Pomerantz's blog can be reached at earlpomernantz.blogspot.com
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.