The new deficit commission is holding its first substantive meeting on Tuesday, and the military contractors are out in force to protect their profits. They'll be working to cash in on hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign donations and lobbying spending, and they'll deploy their favorite (and bogus) "jobs" spin. But members of the committee should not be fooled. The war industry is interested in one thing: continuing profits at our expense.
On Tuesday, a campaign called "Second To None," backed by the largest names in the military contracting industry, is staging a "march to the Hill." These contractors will be armed with fresh talking points and backed by 843 lobbyists (many of whom are former staffers of deficit committee members), along with deep campaign donation histories with the members. Every bit of this influence will be used to prevail upon the committee not to call for cuts to military spending in its final report to Congress.
The persuasion effort aimed at committee members will be largely an inside game, so our War Costs campaign went on offense yesterday with a full-page ad in a Capitol Hill insider publication to call for cuts to the war budget. (Please join our efforts by joining War Costs on Facebook.) But, since the contractors' game beyond the back-rooms will be waged using predictable talking points, committee members should know that the central thrust of the contractors' case for continued huge war budgets is false.
War spending costs us jobs compared to other ways of spending the money. For every billion dollars we spend on war instead of education, renewable energy technology, or even simple tax cuts for consumption, we give lose between 3,200 and 11,700 jobs, at least. War spending is terrible at job creation, period.
Now, keep that several-thousand-jobs cost per billion dollars in mind when you look at the following list. It's the amount in revenues that each of the top five military contractors made in 2010 strictly through doing business with the U.S. government, according to their annual reports:
- Lockheed Martin: $38.4 billion (84 percent of total 2010 revenues)
- Northrop Grummon: $32.1 billion (92 percent of total 2010 revenues)
- Boeing: $27.7 billion (43 percent of total 2010 revenues)
- General Dynamics: $23.3 billion (72 percent of 2010 revenues)
- Raytheon: $22.3 billion (88 percent of total 2010 revenues)
These companies have proven track records of doing or saying anything to protect profits.
. The committee members should remember that when these guys come calling on Tuesday with talking points in hand, especially since
. The truth is no obstacle for these companies when profit is on the line.
Nor are these companies averse to spending money to make even more money. Between 2007 and today, they donated $1.4 million to the committee members' campaigns and PACs (according to information compiled from OpenSecrets.org), and they've spent $210 million in the last 18 months on lobbying. You can bet they'll spend more--much more--to keep the billions flowing from our hands and into their pockets. What happens in the deficit committee over the next several weeks will be a test of whether our representatives can make decisions in the name of the common good, or whether our government really is for sale.
We don't have the luxury of sitting back and watching this process play out. We're going right at Second To None and the corporations behind them, starting today, but we need your help to get through to the committee. Now is the time for every person who wants to put America back to work to
call the committee co-chairs and tell them we need real cuts to the war budget.
- Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash.): (202) 224-2621
- U.S. Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas): (202) 225-3484
Join War Costs on Facebook, and follow Robert Greenwald and Derrick Crowe on Twitter. Support HuffPost
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.
Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your contribution of as little as $2 will go a long way.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.