The harsh campaign between Democrats Eliot Spitzer and Scott Stringer for New York City comptroller dove deeper into negative territory during their first debate Friday morning.
Stringer, who trails Spitzer by 9 points in the most recent poll, repeatedly tried to tar the former New York governor for his wealth, and the prostitution scandal that forced him to resign the office in 2008.
"This battle for comptroller is about two tiers of justice," Stringer said in a debate, which is scheduled to air at 11 a.m. Sunday on ABC, and was livestreamed on TV station WABC's website. "One for the wealthy and one for the rest of us."
Spitzer, sought to portray Stringer, the Manhattan borough president, as a career politician with a thin record. He contrasted it unfavorably with his own tenure as governor and state attorney general targeting Wall Street firms before the 2008 financial collapse.
"I was independent. I was the one who said that crisis awaits us," Spitzer said. Later, he turned to Stringer and asked, "what indelible mark have you left on policy?"
Assembled at the WABC studios in New York, a panel of journalists asked Spitzer directly why voters should trust him in elected office again after his resignation.
"I'm asking voters to look at the totality of my record. ... We did the things the public cares about," he said, citing an infusion of more than $1 billion into the city's pubic school system when he was governor.
But Stringer referenced the sex scandal again, after Spitzer took pride in "breaking some eggs" to push through reforms.
"You broke your own eggs, because you engaged in illicit, illegal behavior," Stringer declared.
He also disputed Spitzer's claim that his years in the governor's mansion were a success, reminding viewers of Spitzer's combative style with the state Legislature.
"My opponent couldn't negotiate anything," said Stringer. "I'm going to be a steady hand."
Stringer had expected to cruise to victory until Spitzer's surprise decision to reenter politics in July. He complained of being "underfunded" compared to Spitzer, who is campaigning with his own money. But Spitzer said the contest was roughly even because super PACS have declared they'll spend millions to back Stringer.
Both candidates declined to say who they support in the New York mayoral race, noting that it could lead to confrontations later. They also both dodged a question on whether they wanted to run for mayor in the future, saying that their focus is on the comptroller's office.
When asked about policy issues, Stringer said the minimum wage should be raised immediately to $10 per hour, while Spitzer said jumping to $8 with annual adjustments is necessary.
Retroactive raises for firefighters, police and teachers are favored by Spitzer while Stringer, who's backed by organized labor, said he won't rule out cutting benefits to municipal workers.
Spitzer is considered a strong debater and recent years working on CNN and Current probably helped his poise before the cameras.
Readers answering a snap poll on the New York Daily News website, however, said Stringer won this contest,. The survey was unscientific, but 58 percent of readers gave Stringer the edge compared to 34 percent for Spitzer about an hour after they wrapped up.
Their next debate is scheduled for Aug. 12.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.