From THE SLANT: <i>The New York Times Magazine</i>'s Andrew Goldman on Fact-checking

From THE SLANT:'s Andrew Goldman on Fact-checking
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Andrew Goldman, the "Talk" columnist at The New York Times Magazine, may be one of the shittiest fact-checkers in history, or at least, he seems to think so. When he came to New York City in 1996, he snagged a plumb checking gig at New York magazine that lasted all of one week. "I was a disaster. I was just given a highlighter, but I had no idea what to do with it, so I highlighted everything. I was like fact-checking the word 'is'! It was impossible."

After pissing off editors with his artless digging -- including Ariel Kaminer, whose ethics column, until her recent departure, sat only pages away from Goldman's own in the Times magazine -- he wasn't called back. Since that fumbling first start he went on to land sweet staff writing spots at Boston Magazine, The New York Observer, Radar and Tina Brown's short-lived, but celebrated Talk.

In 2002, he ditched office-life to become a full-time freelancer. His work has appeared in The New Yorker, New York, Elle, The Daily Beast, Wired, and many others. Now the well-established provocateur speaks candidly with The Slant about raising the ire of Richard Gere, Gloria Allred and Larry Summers. He also confesses a reverence for "pain in the ass fact-checkers" and the vital function they serve in maintaining journalism's integrity.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot