Police in North Carolina may declare parts of the Charlotte metropolitan area off-limits to people who have been arrested for crimes, The Charlotte Observer reported this week.
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department says it is considering whether to propose an ordinance that would create "public safety zones," in which anyone arrested for a crime would be banned from returning to the zone for a year.
The proposal is still in the development phase and would need to be approved by the city council’s community safety committee, Deputy City Attorney Mark Newbold told The Huffington Post. He added that the city has not yet determined which type of public areas would be included in this new policy. "As it sits right now, we're still at the discussion level," he said.
The new policy could include provisions that allow anyone found not guilty of a crime to return to the public safety zones, Steve Harrison of the Observer wrote. Officials also said they would likely give individuals a chance to appeal their exclusion if they need to enter the zone for work or pick up a child from school.
Newbold acknowledged that the proposal would face "significant constitutional hurdles" in a memo to the community safety committee, which he elaborated on in an interview with HuffPost. "One of the questions that comes up is, 'Can you grant exceptions that would not interfere with fundamental rights?'" said Newbold. "For example, the right to be with your family, or the right to obtain social services."
But beyond that, it might not even be an effective method of fighting crime, according to experts.
"I don't know of any evidence that this strategy does anything," David Weisburd, a professor at George Mason University and director of the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, told HuffPost.
Weisburd and his colleague, David Wilson, have studied area-based policing strategies and said that while this kind of exclusionary zone doesn't work, so-called "hot-spot policing" -- which is based on the idea that a disproportionate amount of crime is clustered in small areas -- can be more effective.
"What they should be doing is identifying the streets that have problems, [and] they should be increasing police patrol at those streets," Weisburd said. "They should be using problem-solving patrols to figure out what the problems are and do something about it."
That kind of strategy helps reduce crime without simply pushing it to other locations, the researchers found. "A large number of very high-quality, randomized control trials have shown that hot-spot policing reduces crime, but doesn't displace crime," Wilson, chair of George Mason's Criminology, Law and Society Department, told HuffPost.
"The thing that makes hot-spot policing effective is that they are really small geographic areas -- a street intersection, not a neighborhood," Wilson said, adding that he believes efforts like Charlotte's are meant to make the public feel safer, but do not have a real, tangible benefit.
Judith Greene, director of the nonprofit research organization Justice Strategies, believes that the real issues are poverty, lack of employment, substance addiction and mental illness.
"To address those issues with a police crackdown is a way of showing that the police are 'doing something,' but in no way will it address the criminogenic factors in areas like that," Greene told HuffPost. "It's not a useful or effective way of addressing crime problems."
The idea of creating crime-free zones is nothing new. Portland, Oregon, established drug and prostitution exclusion zones in 1992. Fifteen years later, former Portland Mayor Tom Potter helped to end the policy, citing statistics that showed a disproportionate number of African-Americans were being excluded from the zones. Potter also said he believed the exclusion zones simply moved criminal activity elsewhere.
The city of Charlotte has stopped enforcing prostitution-free zones that were implemented in 2005 after finding they had no significant impact on crime.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.