In Walden, Henry David Thoreau says, "Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk." What Thoreau was referring to was the practice of some New England dairy farmers to dilute their milk in order to make a bigger profit. The liquid still looked like milk and mostly tasted like it, but if a trout could swim in it . . . .
Coincidence? Just circumstantial evidence? How are we to make sense of a series of meetings between a number of President Trump’s close associates (Paul Manafort, Carter Page, JD Gordon, Walid Phares, Flynn, Jeff Sessions and others) and people tied to Russian Intelligence (Vladimir Putin, Igor Sechin, Sergey Kislyak et al)?
The coincidence becomes even harder to defend when one includes WikiLeaks in the mix. According to British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, Russian sources shared with the Trump campaign documents damaging to Hillary Clinton, which they disclosed would be released through WikiLeaks with the apparent quid pro quo that in exchange for this advantage in the election, the Trump Administration would de-emphasize Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and undermine NATO, which in fact happened.
During the campaign, Trump political adviser Roger Stone revealed that he had foreknowledge of future WikiLeaks releases, including, right up until election day, hacked emails from Clinton campaign manager, John Podesta. There is evidence that some in the Trump camp knew the content of such leaks before they were released, even warning of an “October surprise.” Trump exploited the WikiLeaks data to the hilt. In July, he said, “I will tell you this, Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.” In the month leading up to election day, he referred to WikiLeaks 164 times, often praising it: “Wikileaks, I love Wikileaks!”
The Trump administration and the majority of Republicans want to convince us that with all of this, there is no connection, no correspondence, and that ultimately circumstantial evidence is no evidence at all.
Yet, when circumstantial evidence is as overwhelming as it is with the many known contacts between Trump’s people and Putin’s people (with more being revealed all the time), and the content and outcome of those meetings increasingly uncovered, it should be placed in the “trout in milk” category: if one sees a fish in a can of milk, one has to conclude that, contrary to all we know of fish, at least one can swim in milk or that the milk has been diluted. Although there are no witnesses to the farmer’s duplicity, we can be certain, as one anonymous critic has observed, “the squiggly rainbow didn’t come from a cow’s udder”!
In relation to the same data Trump and his allies see as coincidence, Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, asks:
Is it possible that all of these events and reports are completely unrelated, and nothing more than an entirely unhappy coincidence? Yes, it is possible. But it is also possible, maybe more than possible, that they are not coincidental, not disconnected and not unrelated, and that the Russians used the same techniques to corrupt U.S. persons that they have employed in Europe and elsewhere. We simply don’t know, not yet, and we owe it to the country to find out.”
Later, having been privy to additional sources, Schiff affirms that the evidence is “more than circumstantial” and that continuing the investigation is critical:
“The stakes are nothing less than the future of liberal democracy.”
As Ian Fleming says, “Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.”
And a trout swimming in milk is at the very least highly suspicious.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.