Jamie Dimon thinks that because people now have iPhones, inequality is a thing of the past. At an event in Detroit last week, the JP Morgan CEO said declining median incomes don't mean people are worse off than they used to be: “If you go back 20 years ago, cars were worse, health was worse, you didn’t live as long, the air was worse. People didn’t have iPhones.”
Dismissing poverty and inequality because some poor and middle-class people own things that used to be considered luxuries is a trope detached from reality. And yet it comes up over and over.
Advertisement
Rush Limbaugh, along with Fox News' Bill O’Reilly and Stuart Varney, seized on a 2011 Heritage Foundation report to argue that the true economic status of America’s poor should be upgraded with scare quotes to “poor” because some of them have refrigerators, microwaves, air conditioners, dishwashers, TVs, coffeemakers and cell phones. "The Joad family didn’t have a TV or a microwave" seems to be the beginning and end of the argument.
What these critics never mention is that the poor suffer wildly disparate access to basic economic and human needs like housing, education, healthcare and due process under the law. Also never mentioned is the fact that the value of these goods, combined, is around a few hundred dollars -- not high enough to lift a family out of poverty.
Poor people own these things because they are inexpensive and because they have gotten cheaper over the years. Last year Annie Lowrey, then at The New York Times, charted the dramatic drop in prices for consumer electronics, clothes and cars:
Advertisement
Meanwhile, these things have gotten more expensive: health care, child care and education. There’s a reason medical bills and not Best Buy shopping binges are the leading cause of personal bankruptcy. “America is a place where the luxuries are cheap and the necessities are expensive,” professor Joseph Cohen of Queens College told the AP last year.
Some of those "luxury" items, such as cells phones and cars, are necessities for meaningful employment -- in most jobs at most American cities, you need to find an open job, apply for it, obtain it and then transport yourself there.
Dimon’s argument that income inequality isn’t actually bad because the iPhone exists, cars are better and Americans, on average, live three years longer than they did two decades ago is similarly misguided. It’s not as crass and mean-spirited as the idea that poverty isn’t bad anymore simply because of the tautology that cheap things are affordable to many people. But it’s the polite-company corollary to Fox News’ poverty trutherism.
Dimon argues that what economists refer to as consumption inequality, a measure of the gap in how much people spend, mitigates rising income inequality. But unfortunately, that's not the case; consumption inequality “closely tracked” income inequality from 1980 to 2007, research from Mark Aguiar and Mark Bils, both of the University of Rochester, shows. That means that the gap in how much Americans spend has grown, not narrowed, just like the gap in how much money they make.
Those were not isolated findings. A paper by Orazio Attanasio of University College London, Erik Hurst of the University of Chicago and Luigi of Stanford University found that contrary to the idea that “the increase in consumption inequality is still an open debate ... consumption inequality increased substantially” between 1980 and 2010. And it increased “nearly the same amount as income inequality.”
Advertisement
In his recent remarks, Dimon is also aligning himself with Andy Warhol, who famously said that “America started the tradition where the richest consumers buy essentially the same things as the poorest. ... The President drinks Coke, Liz Taylor drinks Coke, and just think, you can drink Coke, too. A Coke is a Coke and no amount of money can get you a better Coke.”
Warhol was right, but only about inexpensive, interchangeable things. The reality of consumption inequality is masked when we think of spending only as the ability to buy cheap, ubiquitous products.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.