The question has been asked for years, and it is time now, once and for all, to answer it. Is The Daily Show really a news program, like, say, the CBS Evening News?
The answer, of course, is yes. And no. But much closer to the former than some people might think.
Example: A few months ago, Katie Couric said words to this effect, and I paraphrase loosely: Republican presidential candidate John McCain has changed his position on offshore oil-drilling. Once opposed to it, he now seems more favorably disposed, telling an audience in Texas that the states should decide the matter for themselves.
On The Daily Show more recently, Jon Stewart said words to this effect, another paraphrase: Some people are opposed to offshore oil-drilling.
Then he cut to a sound bite from the summer in which McCain announced his opposition.
Cut back to Stewart: Then again, some people are in favor of offshore drilling.
Cut to a more recent sound bite from McCain declaring that it's not such a bad idea after all.
The editorial content of the CBS Evening News---and the ABC and NBC evening newscasts---was precisely the same as that of The Daily Show. Only the style of presentation was different. As was the effect on the audience. By presenting its report with humor, The Daily Show related McCain's change of attitude in a more forceful manner than did the other broadcasts. Jokes always make a more enduring impression than straight lines.
Related question: Is The Daily Show really a news analysis program, like, say, Campbell Brown's CNN offering? Yes. And no. But still closer to yes.
In the aftermath of Sean Hannity's interview with Sarah Palin, in which Hannity was operating at a disadvantage because he forgot his shoeshine kit and could not, therefore, polish the governor's footwear between questions, TV commentators offered their opinions of the conversation. Most were negative. Most thought Hannity's behavior was biased in Palin's favor. Most thought her shoes could have used a bit more sheen.
The Daily Show thought so, too. But it illustrated its opinion with sound bites from the interview in which Hannity's questions about the economy often began with Barack Obama's name. Obama thinks this, Hannity said. Obama thinks that. Do you think Obama can possibly have any grasp of the situation?
In other words, The Daily Show demonstrated that Hannity was setting up Palin to make political charges, not discuss economic policy. Hannity was not tossing softballs; he was, rather, conspiring to camouflage the governor's ignorance of the topic and therefore promoting a political position.
Once again, The Daily Show's editorial content---or, in this case, its analytical viewpoint---was the same as that of most other journalistic outlets that discussed the subject.
In truth, The Daily Show has more in common with Jim Lehrer's Newhour on PBS that it does with such other Comedy Central presentations as South Park. The latter often dwells on Cartman's evil scheming, and the effects it has on his fellow third graders and others.
On the other hand, The Daily Show last week presented a two-part interview with former British prime minister Tony Blair. Also featured was former president Bill Clinton on the Clinton Global Initiative. In both cases, the guests were given longer periods of time to present their views than they would have been given on most conventional newscasts.
Yes, Jon Stewart has a point of view. Yes, that point of view is liberal. And yes, of course, he has a sense of humor.
But also yes, with apologies to Stewart, who often insists otherwise, The Daily Show is a news show. Itis a news analysis show. The laughter it elicits does not dilute its subject matter; it makes the subject matter more memorable and barbed.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.