This idea of the artist is a far cry from the ethos many baby boomers grew up with, influenced as they were by the idea of creative people as drop outs and rebels against rigidity and routine. Their role models were the abstract expressionists of the 50's or rock stars like Janis Joplin and Jimi Hendrix whose lives were like supernovas which blazed forth a blinding light just as they courted oblivion. The kind of writers and artists that Brooks is writing about seem more like businessmen. Brooks remarks,
A modern stoic knows that the surest way to discipline passion is to discipline time: decide what you want or ought to do during the day, then always do it at exactly the same moment every day, and passion will give you no trouble.
That statement recalls Flaubert's famous quote that one should,
They think like artists, but work like accountants.
How are these two conflicting views translatable on the world stage? Brooks uses the occasion of his piece to praise President Obama's speech at the U.N. which he says, "put tough minded realism at the service of a high calling." But is discipline in the political sphere really translatable into inspiration? Artists are attempting to find something through the maintenance of a practice but what is a politician or leader trying to find? The answer is usually a series of intelligent decisions that lead his country out of a quagmire. Pigmeat Markham once intoned,
Be regular and orderly in your life like a bourgeois, so that you may be violent and original in your work.
"Uh-oh, Here Come the Judge, Here Come the Judge/Everybody know That he is the judge."
A political leader has no choice but to work in a consistent and disciplined way, but it's no guarantee that his or her actions will lead to the kind of vision that characterizes the work of the artistic geniuses who Brooks cites.
Photo of Somerset Maugham by Carl Van Vechten
This was originally posted to The Screaming Pope, Francis Levy's blog of rants and reactions to contemporary politics, art and culture.