Hell might be getting ready to freeze over. Nate Silver, the New York Times' resident nerdistician, has calculated that there is a 77% chance that Mitt Romney could lose the Michigan primary. This is the same Michigan where Mitt was born. The same Michigan where his father served as governor. Romney losing Michigan would be like a Bush losing in Texas or a Kennedy losing in Massachusetts.
If Rick Santorum pulls off the upset, it'll be the biggest victory for the sweater-vest set since Jim Tressel's Buckeyes went 8-1 against the Wolverines. But unlike the Michigan-Ohio State football rivalry, the winner won't benefit since everyone knows that Santorum winning the Republican nomination would be a bigger miracle than anything described in the Book of Mormon.
What will consume the political-industrial complex will be reverse engineering how Mitt Romney lost after pleading in an ad, "Michigan has been my home, and this is personal." Because those other states are so impersonal. Feel the love, Arizona.
The hilarious thing about the ad is how Romney has to resort to reminiscing about how he went "to the Detroit Auto Show with my dad" while driving a Chrysler 300 built in Canada. Romney's video valentine to chrome, fins and V8 engines is a telling gambit for a politician desperate to convince Michigan voters that he was once one of them, too.
Romney's paying for his idiotic opposition to Barack Obama's rescue of the American auto industry. Shortly after Obama's election, Romney penned an op-ed in the New York Times in which Romney predicted that if Obama bailed out the car makers, their "demise will be virtually guaranteed." Thank goodness he included "virtually." The op-ed is best known today not for that wildly incorrect prediction but for the headline some heroic copy editor gave the column: "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt." Even if he didn't write it, the headline perfectly captures the je ne sais quoi of Romney's rich-get-richer Mittocracy.
By now, the facts are clear. If Obama hadn't bailed out Chrysler and General Motors, America would have had to strip Michigan down and sell it for parts to Canada. It doesn't matter that the Chrysler that Romney drove in his ad was made in Canada. It matters that it wouldn't exist if he were president. Had Chrysler and GM failed, they would have taken the auto maker supply chain down with it and cost the country 1.1 million jobs.
Ford CEO Alan Mulally said that even though his company did not take government funds, "if GM and Chrysler would have gone into freefall bankruptcy, they would have taken the supply base down and taken the industry down plus maybe turned the U.S. recession into a depression."
Instead of doing what Romney wanted and letting the invisible hand slap the auto industry around, Obama stepped in. He invested $8.5 billion of your money but required big changes, and last year he announced that the auto makers paid back the loan five years early and returned $11.2 billion to the taxpayers -- and everyone in Michigan knows it because they still make cars there.
There is no doubt in Detroit that the auto bailout worked. Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne said that anyone who claims the company could have made it without Obama's help is "smoking illegal material."
Politically, this means that Romney has to figure out how to explain that he didn't really write what he really wrote when he opposed helping the auto industry.
"Whether you're a Republican, Democrat, or Independent in Michigan, you're likely for auto jobs first. When the industry hit tough times, Mitt Romney said four words: 'Let them go bankrupt.' An auto collapse would have been Armageddon for Michigan, and his position feels a bit traitorous to everyone around this parts," said
.
Obama's auto bailout is why Chrysler still exists. It's also why Chrysler had enough cash to air the "Halftime in America" ad during the Super Bowl that featured Clint Eastwood growling about Motor City's comeback. Clint might as well have been telling Mitt to get off his lawn.
Dirty Harry linking Obama's economic policies with America's gutsy comeback might have cost Romney the Michigan primary as well as a chance to turn the state red in November. Republicans, reacting with their usual grace and charm, responded to the Chrysler ad by doubling down on stupid. Karl Rove told Fox News, "I was, frankly, offended by it." I suppose this makes Rove the anti-Chrysler.
The problem for Romney, Rove and everyone else in the Republican Party is that the auto bailout worked. Romney might be able to sell his nursery rhyme of creeping socialism elsewhere, but in Michigan, majorities of voters support the auto bailout and like Clint Eastwood's Chrysler ad. Romney's narrative depends upon people believing that Obama's policies hurt America, but now he has to make people doubt Clint Eastwood when he brags, "The world's gonna hear the roar of our engines."
The economy's getting better. Hundreds of thousands of people are going back to work every month. Detroit still makes cars. When Americans and Michiganers in particular are taking pride in their comeback, maybe we shouldn't be asking whether we are better off than we were four years ago.
Maybe it's time for Mitt to ask himself one question: Do you feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.