Between 2012 and 2013, population growth for 20-34 year-olds was highest in Colorado Springs and San Antonio, while Austin and Raleigh were tops for 50-69 year-olds. But New York, Washington D.C., and Boston all had among the highest growth for 0-4 year-olds.
This week the Census released its 2013 population estimates by age group for counties, which reveals which local areas are gaining or losing millennials, boomers, and other age groups. Earlier this year, the Census released 2013 population estimates for the overall population -- not broken out by age group: at that time we pointed out that the most urban counties had slower population growth than the more suburban counties, even though the most urban counties were growing faster than they did during the housing bubble.
Today's new data tell us whether key demographic groups -- like millennials (20-34 year olds), boomers (50-69 year olds), and young kids (0-4 year-olds) -- might be bucking the broader trend of more suburban counties growing faster than the most urban counties. To measure this, we use the same approach of dividing all U.S. counties into four quartiles based on their household density so that each quartile includes around one-fourth of the total population (see note on county definitions and age groups). Going from the highest to lowest density, the four categories correspond roughly to (1) big, dense cities; (2) big-city suburbs and lower-density cities; (3) lower-density suburbs and small cities; and (4) smaller towns and rural areas.
The punchline: millennial population growth in 2012-2013 in big, dense cities was outpaced by big-city suburbs and lower-density cities and even by lower-density suburbs and smaller cities. Boomer growth in big, dense cities also fell just short of growth in the big-city suburbs and lower-density cities. But the population of kids under the age of 5 grew fastest in big, dense cities. Let's take a look at each of the age groups.
Millennials Not Flocking to Big Cities
From 2012 to 2013, population growth for millennials (20-34 year-olds) was highest outside big cities. The fastest growth was in the second quartile of counties ranked by density (big-city suburbs and lower-density cities). Furthermore, the third quartile (lower-density suburbs and smaller cities) edged out the top quartile (big, dense cities) for millennial population growth:
The differences aren't huge, but there's clearly no mad rush to the cities -- despite the shift from homeownership to renting among these young adults.
At the metro level, Colorado Springs, San Antonio, and Peabody (the metro division just north of Boston) experienced the fastest growth in the millennial population. Nine of the 10 metros with the fastest millennial population growth were in the South and West.
In addition to the top 10, there are several metros with above-average millennial population growth despite slow growth in other age groups. In
,
,
,
,
, and
, Millennial population growth was above the national average for millennials of 1.2%, even though population growth across all age groups in those metros was sluggish.
Boomers Getting More Urban
Boomer (50-69 year-olds) population growth in the past year was also highest in the second quartile of counties (big-city suburbs and lower-density cities), but only slightly ahead of the growth in the top quartile (big, dense cities). Boomer growth was slower in the third quartile (lower density suburbs and small cities) and the bottom quartile of counties (small towns and rural areas). Overall, boomer population growth skewed more urban than millennial growth did:
All of the metros with the fastest growing boomer population were in the South and West, with Texas and the Carolinas dominating the list:
Here's what else these boomer-attracting metros have in common: they tend to have relatively young populations. In fact, Austin has the highest share of millennials of any large metro; millennials account for disproportionately high shares of the populations of Charleston, Dallas, and Houston as well. That pattern holds more generally -- the correlation between a metro's
share
of millennials and
growth rate
of boomers is 0.4, positive and statistically significant. That means that boomers increasingly want to be where millennials live already.
Unlike for millennials, and more so than for boomers, population growth for the youngest Americans -- those aged 0-4 -- is strongly skewed toward the most urban counties. Although the number of kids under 5 declined in the U.S. overall between 2012 and 2013, it grew fastest in the most urban counties and declined most sharply in the least dense counties:
The top 10 metros for the population growth of kids under age of 5 include the three big east-coast metros of Washington, New York and Boston:
Furthermore, within metros, the population growth for kids under the age of 5 was highest in the most urban counties of those metros. In the New York metro, for instance, the 0-4 year-old population increased by 2.4% in both
and Hudson County, NJ, and 2.0% in
-- all very urban counties -- but fell by 1.2% in both Westchester County, NY, and Bergen County, NJ, which are both more suburban. Population growth for 0-4 year-olds was also higher in the District of Columbia than in the Washington D.C. area suburbs, and higher in Suffolk County -- which includes Boston -- than its surrounding counties.
These new Census data show, therefore, that millennials are not driving urban growth. Boomers are urbanizing to some extent. But the strongest population shift toward big cities in the past year has been among the stroller set.
Remember, though, that these trends reflect a particular point in the housing and economic cycle. While the trends from the past year (2012-2013) are consistent with the trends over the past three years (2010-2013), these years have been anything but "normal" as the housing market recovers from the swing toward the suburbs during last decade's boom and the fall in homeownership and household formation during the recession. The trends that are happening today may not last; they surely reflect current housing and economic conditions, but don't necessarily reflect a long-term, permanent change in how or where people want to live.
Note: The Census reports population estimates by county for five-year age groups. We defined millennials as 20-34 year-olds and boomers as 50-69 year-olds.
We use tract-weighted county density to reflect the household density of the neighborhood that a typical county resident experiences.
Counties were bucketed so that each quartile covers roughly one quarter of the national population:
- The top quartile includes counties with weighted density above 2000 households per square mile, such as New York City's five boroughs , San Francisco, Suffolk (Boston), MA, Los Angeles, Cook (Chicago), IL, Westchester, NY, and Montgomery, MD.
- The second quartile includes counties with weighted density of 1000-2000 households per square mile, such as big-city suburban counties like Rockland, NY, and Contra Costa, CA, as well as counties containing lower-density cities like Maricopa (Phoenix), AZ, and Erie, PA.
- The third quartile includes counties with weighted density of 500-1000 households per square mile, such as Gwinnett (outside of Atlanta), GA, and Yakima, WA.
- The bottom quartile includes counties with weighted density below 500 households per square mile, including small-town and rural counties. This quartile includes 82% of counties, covering 27% of the U.S. population.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.