<i>GQ</i>'s Cover Blunder: Where's Channing Tatum Shirtless?

Why didn'tput the picture of Channing shirtless on the cover?
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

GQ released its hot cover featuring Channing Tatum and it's spreading like wildfire all over the Internet.

What's also getting a ton of buzz?

The even hotter shirtless pics of Channing inside GQ. CLICK HERE to see the pics!

So - why didn't GQ put the picture of Channing shirtless on the cover?

The magazine looks like it's assuming the general newsstand buyer will remember seeing the shirtless pictures of Channing online and connect them to the cover.

In the competitive newsstand business, that's a big mistake!

While it wouldn't fit GQ's traditional format, the magazine should have at least inset the picture - ultimately reminding the consumer that the pics are inside.

CLICK HERE to see the cover at CoverAwards!

Sound off below!

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot