Movie Review: <i>Much Ado About Nothing</i>

I want to applaud Joss Whedon'sfor all the things it does right, and I will. But Whedon's side project -- between his various TV and Marvel-related entertainments -- gets one thing unfortunately wrong: It's never very funny.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

I want to applaud Joss Whedon's Much Ado About Nothing for all the things it does right, and I will.

But Whedon's side project -- between his various TV and Marvel-related entertainments -- gets one thing unfortunately wrong: It's never very funny.

Much of that has to do with casting. Indeed, Whedon's cast -- which consists of actors who might be considered part of Whedon's ever-growing stock company -- does contain the right actor, but in the wrong role.

So instead of Nathan Fillion as the haughty, romantic Benedick, we get Alexis Denisoff, whose next unmannered line reading will be his first. His snarky head-to-head with Amy Acker's sharp-elbowed Beatrice -- the two antagonists who eventually fall in love with each other -- lacks bite. Acker might as well be pitted against a body pillow, so shapeless and soft is Denisoff's presence.

This review continues on my website.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot