Listening to, one would think that Corporate America was responsible for jobs. Corporate America is responsible for profits. The government is responsible for jobs
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Listening to Morning Joe, one would think that Corporate America was responsible for jobs. Corporate America is responsible for profits. The government is responsible for jobs. After World War II, the South was broke with no industry. We Southern Governors learned quickly that government was responsible for creating jobs. We didn't cut taxes or get federal aid for policemen, firemen and teachers to create jobs. We increased taxes, got a AAA credit rating, beefed up education and skills and industry came running. Today, we have the skills to make Boeing's Globemaster and "the ultimate driving machine" for BMW. But the government in Washington has been giving away our textile industry to spread democracy and South Carolina has 9.6 percent unemployment.

We have heard all the Washington lectures on innovation, skills, productivity, education, etc. In the '70s and '80s, the textile industry was investing $2 billion a year to increase productivity. But the most productive textile industry in the world was offshored to the least productive for foreign policy. I started the Advanced Technology Program in 1989 to develop the innovation backed up in the Bureau of Standards in the Department of Commerce. It worked so well that I got the Competitiveness of the Year Award from industry. But the ATP has been abolished. It's the president and Congress that's not doing their job.

The business leadership would have us believe that globalization is a new phenomenon. The United States was born in globalization or a trade war -- Boston Tea Party. In the early days we produced agriculture cheaper than any other country. But the founding fathers rejected David Ricardo's free trade Doctrine of Comparative Advantage and enacted the Tariff Act of 1787 -- two years before the Constitution. This industrial policy of protectionism worked so well that Edmund Morris writes in Theodore Rex that within a hundred years the Colony "was $25 billion richer" than the Mother Country. As Corporate America builds the economy of China and depletes the economy of the United States we forget our history.

China with its controlled capitalism gives Corporate America certainty and protection for its investment. Corporate America rushes to China with its research, innovation, production, jobs -- our economy. We'll be drained dry if this continues. We can't prevent the offshoring but it's incumbent on the president and Congress to limit the offshoring to maintain a strong economy. This calls for developing and enforcing our industrial policy. Our industrial policy has been embellished over the years with trade laws to make sure the nation can defend itself and the economy can be protected.

If President Obama would enforce the Defense Production Act of 1950 like President Kennedy, we wouldn't be begging Russia for helicopters for Afghanistan. If President Obama would levy a 10 percent surcharge on imports like President Nixon in 1971, when our trade deficit was a miniscule of todays, it would create millions of jobs. If President Obama would protect steel, motor vehicles, computers and machine tools like President Reagan in 1984, our unemployment rate would be 5.3 percent rather than 8.3 percent. If Congress would quit whining about China's devaluing its currency, and act, it would create millions of jobs. The Olympics have just proved that the United States is the most competitive nation in the world. But its government -- the president and Congress -- refuse to compete in globalization. Wall Street, the big banks, and Corporate America want to keep the China profits flowing. They contribute to the president and Congress to do nothing and the president and Congress do nothing.

The president and Congress should replace the 35 percent Corporate Tax with a 7 percent Value Added Tax. 150 nations compete in globalization with a VAT that's rebated on exports. The Corporate Tax is not rebated. Not having a VAT is killing manufacture in the United States. A U.S. manufacturer exporting to China pays the 35 percent Corporate Tax and is levied a 17 percent VAT when its exports reach Shanghai. But a manufacturer in China exports to the United States tax free. Last year the Corporate Tax produced $181.1 billion in revenues. A 7 percent VAT for 2011 would have produced $872 billion in revenues. Cancelling the 35 percent Corporate Tax and replacing it with a 7 percent VAT releases a trillion dollars in offshore profits for Corporate America to create jobs in the United States. This VAT tax cut produces billions to pay for government, creates millions of jobs and jumpstarts the economy.

In the Sally-Port of the main barracks at The Citadel is a plaque by Robert E. Lee: "Duty is the sublimest word in the English language." If we can get the president and Congress to do their duty, the country can go back to work.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot