The rhetoric around the criminal case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn,
IMF president and alleged rapist of a Sofitel hotel worker, has focused
on that worker's "crumbing credibility." She has been described as
someone who lied on her asylum application, was a victim of female
genital mutilation (thank you NPR for this tidbit), has a boyfriend
who is in an immigration jail in Arizona (excellent reporting,
NYTimes) and may be living in an apartment rented exclusively to
adults with HIV or AIDS (wow, NYPost, did you follow her home?).
Even if all of this were true, does it make her claims any less worthy
of investigation? Does it make a prosecutor's decision not to
prosecute okay? She lied about some things, which means that she
probably lied about being sexually assaulted? Why is the prosecution
doing the defense's work?
What about attacks on DSK's credibility? He apparently has a history
of, let's call it euphemistically, "scandalous" behavior. In the
press they've said he has a "history with women," he is a "frisky
Frenchman" and a great man with a "tragic flaw." Which, in this case,
makes him a sexual predator.
They should try DSK's victim's case in the court of law rather than in
the court of public opinion. Let the jury evaluate her credibility
along with any other evidence that can prove her case.
But it's not really just about that, is it? Legalities aside, this is
society making a value judgment as to whether this woman is worthy of
legal protection, civil rights, and human rights. Of being powerful
enough to challenge Dominique Strauss Kahn's friskiness.
Eve Ensler said it beautifully in the Guardian:
How do you
fight a rape case if you have lied in your past? How do you fight a
rape case if you have been sexually active?. . . How do you fight a
rape case if you still believe rape is your fault, if you don't even
know what rape is, if you are afraid of upsetting your
boyfriend/husband, or afraid of getting him in trouble because he will
be more violent to you?
How do you fight a rape case when you don't fit into society's mold of
an ideal woman?
The women we serve may not withstand such scrutiny -- they are often
low-income women of color, often recent immigrants that may work the
exact same job as this woman. They may have over-stayed their tourist
visa, they may be undocumented, they may have had an arranged marriage
that may actually have been a forced marriage. They may have a loved
one also in a detention center. They may be HIV-positive. They may
lie as part of what they need to do as they hustle to survive. When a
system is stacked against you, when you encounter oppressions at every
turn, sometimes you lie.
Unless you fit society's mold of an ideal woman -- preferably white,
preferably middle-class and up, definitely heterosexual and with
demonstrated virtue (you didn't drink alcohol, you didn't date around
or sleep around, fight back or hurt back; wear a bikini, or tell a
lie) -- then it appears that men can rape you, particularly if they hold
more power and have more privilege. And you can do nothing, except
We work with a woman who was repeatedly raped by her employer. She is
low-income with limited English proficiency, and she has not pressed
charges against him. She was arrested once, for shoplifting, because
she brought in items to return to a store, and when the alarms
sounded, security asked her if she took those items, and not
understanding them, since she doesn't speak English, she simply
replied "yes." And now she fears the police, and fears coming
How are we to counsel her? Tell her to speak up and go to the
authorities? We'll press charges and bring him to justice? If we're
lucky, he may spend a few weeks or months in jail and then he'll be
out, and she may still have been left by her husband, and her
community and family may have turned their backs on her. She will
likely be more unsafe, have no job, no access to support or service
and no way to hope for a life of dignity and happiness. On the other
hand, if she is unlucky, all the above WILL STILL BE TRUE, and he
won't spend a single day in jail because she wasn't a credible enough
witness, or a worthy enough woman for a prosecutor prove her case.
The woman we work with does not want to speak up against her employer,
and I can not blame her, especially now.
The treatment of the DSK case will have a silencing effect, one that
compounds the other silencing pressures already imposed on her by her
culture and the stigma imposed by her community. This is a terrible
position for her to be in, and a huge hypocrisy for me, as the
executive director of an organization whose mission is to end violence
At Sakhi, we approach anti-violence work through an anti-structural
violence frame so we can fight to eliminate the root causes of
violence -- the misogyny, racism, classism, xenophobia, sexism and other
ways that women are deprived of their right to live. We want women
not only to survive, but to LIVE lives with hope, dignity and
fundamental human rights.